Reading about and experiencing the lack of stopping power in handgun rounds, I was wondering if anyone had tried using sabots to drive rifle-type 6mm bullets to over 2,000 fps out of .44 Mag or .41 Mag cases in revolvers.
An 80 or 90 grain 6mm projectile built like a Nosler partition or solid base and travelling around 2,200 fps should be devistating compared with slower bullets due to the shock caused by the rapid expansion and relatively deep penetration. The idea came from Remington's "Accelerator" rounds that shoot 55 grain .224 bullets out of a .30-06 at over 4,000 fps. The recoil was considerably less than standard 150-180 grain bullets.
This theory flys in the face of the "bigger and heavier is better" theory, but seeing the "explosive" results of fast expanding rounds on game makes me wonder why something like that wouldn't kill BGs quicker than bullets that just punch holes.
One concern would be locking the bullets and sabots into the cases so they don't pull out from recoil, but the bullets could have cannelures or notches in them and the sabots could be crimped in heavily.
Six millimeter rounds in .243 Win and 6mm Rem make effective deer rounds using the more heavily constructed 100 grain bullets, but 80 or 90 grain bullets could be constructed to open up at 2,000 fps and be quite effective, IMHO.
Okay folks, time to "blow holes" in my theory. Just remember, you heard it here first. Darn, forgot to patent the idea.
Picher
An 80 or 90 grain 6mm projectile built like a Nosler partition or solid base and travelling around 2,200 fps should be devistating compared with slower bullets due to the shock caused by the rapid expansion and relatively deep penetration. The idea came from Remington's "Accelerator" rounds that shoot 55 grain .224 bullets out of a .30-06 at over 4,000 fps. The recoil was considerably less than standard 150-180 grain bullets.
This theory flys in the face of the "bigger and heavier is better" theory, but seeing the "explosive" results of fast expanding rounds on game makes me wonder why something like that wouldn't kill BGs quicker than bullets that just punch holes.
One concern would be locking the bullets and sabots into the cases so they don't pull out from recoil, but the bullets could have cannelures or notches in them and the sabots could be crimped in heavily.
Six millimeter rounds in .243 Win and 6mm Rem make effective deer rounds using the more heavily constructed 100 grain bullets, but 80 or 90 grain bullets could be constructed to open up at 2,000 fps and be quite effective, IMHO.
Okay folks, time to "blow holes" in my theory. Just remember, you heard it here first. Darn, forgot to patent the idea.
Picher