From time to time, folks here and/or on the S&W forum wonder about "mismarked" M15's. Get, "Gun Digest 2003" and read the article on S&W M&P target models. It has the explanation, and it included some data that even I didn't know, and I thought I was pretty well up on Smith & Wesson.
I won't give away the author's whole story, but it seems that, among other issues, the frame as well as the bbl. was different for the two models. So, S&W eventually began making only M15's, regardless of bbl.length, and marked the frames as M15's, because foreign law enfocement sales often specified the Model 15.
This is a good story. There's also one on classic .32/20 revolvers that many will enjoy. By the way, John Taffin has replaced Hal Swiggett as revolver reviewer for the new products section. With all due respect to Mr. Swiggett, this was a positive step, I think.
Lone Star
I won't give away the author's whole story, but it seems that, among other issues, the frame as well as the bbl. was different for the two models. So, S&W eventually began making only M15's, regardless of bbl.length, and marked the frames as M15's, because foreign law enfocement sales often specified the Model 15.
This is a good story. There's also one on classic .32/20 revolvers that many will enjoy. By the way, John Taffin has replaced Hal Swiggett as revolver reviewer for the new products section. With all due respect to Mr. Swiggett, this was a positive step, I think.
Lone Star