A BIG Marco-PoNO on ports, in my view. Ports on anything less than a .44 magnum or hotter is a solution in search of a non-existant problem. Opinions on ports differ, of course... my personal view is this... for a slight reduction in muzzle rise you pay more money, get a lot more blast, flash and noise, more cleaning effort, and much more limited re-sale market for the gun. That blast and noise is sent straight up into your line of sight and hearing (or up under your face if you shoot with a close retention position) and is more intrusive to you than going straight out away from you toward your attacker - where it belongs. On a heavy magnum caliber hunting revolver (.44 mag, .454, 500), where the gun will most certainly be held extended fully away from your body and involve very heavy calibers, porting has it's place, for sure. But I wouldn't have a ported revolver for defense use, even if it cost less money. In defense training, we learn to hold the weapon right close to our body (close retention position) when the attacker is physically very close. Then you would have to shoot the gun held near or against your waist... that would send blast and noise straight up into your face. Count me as no fan of ported defense revolvers.