S&W 4006
- Thread starter Alpha 4
- Start date
The only real downside to mine...
...was its weight. The safety could have been better placed for operation by human hands, too, but I usually just used it as a decocker. It was reliable, shot where I pointed it, and had a better-than-average trigger. Were it not for the company's pusillanimous behaviour of late, I'd cheerfully buy another.
...was its weight. The safety could have been better placed for operation by human hands, too, but I usually just used it as a decocker. It was reliable, shot where I pointed it, and had a better-than-average trigger. Were it not for the company's pusillanimous behaviour of late, I'd cheerfully buy another.
I have one and have found it to be very solid and very reliable. However, Tamara's trigger must have been assembled by a true craftsman and mine was assembled by his apprentice during his first week at work. It is very gritty and does not have a consistent pull weight in either DA or SA. Also the trigger mechanism is extremely compicated when compared to pistols of similar quality. Strictly because of the trigger, I rarely fire it. Yes, I know a good qualified smithy could work wonders on it, but I haven't gotten around to sending it off and probably never will. But I will never sell it because I like the way it looks and, frankly, I never plan to sell another gun no matter what. (I sold a Browning HP in the 60's and still regret it after all these years. I'm rambling, aren't I? 
)
)