S&W 17

Classic12

New member
I just bought this 1960 made 17, the K-22 Masterpiece

It has honest wear, scars, German proof marks and a patina to it. I’ll use it as a shooter, bought it for $ 530

93053f84c8d9d9a5b4333dd443a220e1.jpg


5bad40c337f891f4f086e408223149d5.jpg


26c5ecbced0b02f740d7ee343c0e635a.jpg


30648198b3bb9d294259bb25e28ebf87.jpg


a51c1d9a43f1514aa49180c7273a34c6.jpg


91be0571a3e7367fc668913b43a4db8d.jpg


ee4fed074d4d4b0b7abf611eb9302a8f.jpg


95ef29a8ea1bbc8607fefd39d85c563d.jpg


e0d4043e892f941f50a533361e688f4e.jpg
 
Last edited:
S&W 17-2

Ulm proof mark from 1962

6e7fdd334601c3f04f37ee1c19c1cf15.jpg


400e4b784cf43331e8d3e3ec028e8f6e.jpg


d9e82f9e1f37efa3e434f437d8afae39.jpg


522222bb8e84ac42afc18319bd84315b.jpg


A GECO stamp, they probably imported it into Germany back then

b6a1c467c639892b822cad400bf4b2a2.jpg


1373b6fd05c8324651702c1bfb3a02fe.jpg



25 m target

2b7a589a3e18c4c878ba8a6dde85cbae.jpg


Edit. It’s a 17 no dash, I got confused with my friend’s 1966 -2
 
Last edited:
The K22 Masterpiece's are wonderful shooters. I have had a pair of them for many years now and have found that they are a bit sensitive to the ammo you use. If you are concerned about getting wringing the best accuracy out of yours, you might try some different brands and velocities. Mine seem to like standard velocity the best, but yours may like an entirely different type.


Both of these were made in 1948
IMG_3728_Fotor-XL.jpg
 
Have two, junk, not accurate at all. Gave up fixing them after I bought the Ruger Mark II. Mark II, Colt Trooper and Gold Cup shoot circles around the two M17.

Don't just shoot to judge, sand bag and shoot like 30 rounds and see the grouping. One has flyers one out of about 10 rounds, the other one just lousy grouping. I do gun smithing, I checked all the spacing and they are tight, but still not accurate. Here are the two M17 in the picture:
attachment.php


The Colt Trooper on the top of the picture is very accurate.
 
Last edited:
I have a Model 17-3 and a K-22 from circa 1948. I also have a Colt Cobra in .22 and Colt Diamondback in .22. For some reason, whenever I want to shoot a .22 revolver, it's almost always the K-22.
 
I have a few M17s and just got a pre17 “K” manf. 1947. 1st of K prefix. This is 5screw gun.
Excellent shape, no target hammer & trigger. Tapered barrel and narrow rib. Only negative was wrong grips. Now wearing correct Diamond Magnas. I’m still shooting one I got NIB in
1964. Carried like a pocket knife and shot thousands of rounds. Still tight and accurate but does have honest wear on blue. I’ve owned couple dozen K22s never had a bad one.
 
I've got one k22 Masterpiece but few differences in mine and these. On the right side in front of the trigger guard it say only "made in USA". The trigger is steel and not that white color. Don't have a model number anywhere. I asked about it on the S&W web and they told me it was a K22 masterpiece but that was it. Pretty low serial number 52,937. I have a mod 17 in 32 long and where the model number is is where the serial number is on this 22. They'd told me when it was made but I forget. They said it was worth about $2500. It is really a very nice gun but my H&R HD Military will out shoot it.
 
Don,

Your K22 Masterpiece was made in 1948 and that .32 Long revolver is a model 16, not a model 17.

Don
 
Neat! I got it's older brother. A S&W M&P that was turned into a target rimfire revolver by Parker Hale. It is a very smooth gun and easy to shoot well, thanks to its excellent sights.

 
I just bought this 1960 made 17, the K-22 Masterpiece
It has honest wear, scars, German proof marks and a patina to it. I’ll use it as a shooter, bought it for $ 530.
Beautiful gun right there, and snagged at a great price too. Congrats.

In fact, the OP's first pic displays all you need see: Old School revolver beauty in its natural state ... UNmarred by any horrific looking Hillary Hole! :eek:

Hear me now; thank me later. ;)
 
Back
Top