A person formerly associated with a department in tx blogged a post containing text ostensibly taken from Texas statutes.
http://www.thatsnonsense.com/legal-use-deadly-force-protect-statues-texas/
He stated plainly defense against the destruction of a statue by deadly force.
I believe that the laws involve only private, personal property, and that this is clearly a lie, inflammatory and possibly dangerous.
Would tx lawyers weigh in and is there any point in sharing the post that debunked it?
http://www.thatsnonsense.com/legal-use-deadly-force-protect-statues-texas/
He stated plainly defense against the destruction of a statue by deadly force.
I believe that the laws involve only private, personal property, and that this is clearly a lie, inflammatory and possibly dangerous.
Would tx lawyers weigh in and is there any point in sharing the post that debunked it?
Last edited: