Mike Irwin said:What the hell was the backstop area made of?
Bales of kerosene-soaked cotton?
The article said the shooter would not be prosecuted since it was an accident. If the range had rules on using tracer rounds, then the shooter has liability whether he likes it or not. The insurance company will take him to court regardless of what the article said if tracers were not allowed at the range.
It only takes a split second to touch a couple off. By the time he'd have registered what happened, the fire would have already started.My question though, where was the RSO - range safety officer as it was reported that the shooter fired multiple tracer rounds?
What the hell was the backstop area made of?
Bales of kerosene-soaked cotton?
In the case I saw, it was a steel backstop. The tracer ignited small amounts of unburnt powder. It was enough to send some flames into the exhaust, which spread from there.
Most ranges I know don't allow steel core ammo simply because it really batters the impact plates in addition to the spark issues.
Stupid question but, to avoid this, how does one know if they have steel core ammunition?