Ruger SR1911 with Aluminum Frame

J

jbmiller23

New member
I'm interested in the Ruger SR 1911 with the aluminum frame. It's a new gun, but I'm curious if anyone has any thoughts or things to consider before purchasing.
 
I suspect it will be a big hit. It is much lighter for carry. Ruger makes a pretty solid gun. The SR1911 hasn't been without it's bobbles, but Ruger is taking them into consideration and making adjustments to the guns. If you do have any issues, it's safe to say that Ruger will make it right.
 
I actually had this on my wishlist until I had a realization.

I've a Sig P220 Equinox. It's a .45ACP handgun that looks and feels great, but has more recoil than I'd like. The P220 appears to have more recoil than the .40 Sigs I've shot...it makes a .40 seem not-so-snappy. I'm pretty sure its because my P220 has an alloy frame...it's a light gun, but I think the lack of mass means that the recoil isn't being absorbed by the frame as it would a non-alloy framed gun. A lot of the recoil is making it to my hand, and I'm not a recoil-sensitive person. It might not even be an issue for you, though.

I read a post where someone who owned a P220 Stainless Elite was at a range and the guy beside him had a P220 Equinox. It's basically the same gun, just that the Elite has a beavertail and is all steel, whereas the Equinox has a tiny tail and an alloy frame. They traded guns and fired a few mags. The guy with the Equinox was disgusted with his guns' recoil. I'm pretty sure the mass of the Elite negated much of the recoil (although beavertail maybe played a small part). I'm sure one can get used to the recoil characteristics, with time, though.

Hickok45 has two reviews of the CDR version of the SR1911 Lightweight...he likes it a LOT (most people do).
 
Last edited:
Well, of course a lighter gun has more recoil than a heavier one. Physics and all that....
An aluminum frame .45 1911 type gun is still manageable by most people.
 
Well, of course a lighter gun has more recoil than a heavier one. Physics and all that....
An aluminum frame .45 1911 type gun is still manageable by most people.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I never said it was unmanageable and I already explained that less mass equals more recoil. I also mentioned that it might not be an issue...totally depends on the person's expectations.

I still thought it was worth mentioning...better to discuss it now than after the OP buying it, IMO.
 
I've got one and it's been great so far, I really like it. Recoil probably is bit more than an all steel version but it's far from bad. I've ran 230gr FMJ, 200gr lead SWC and some varied JHP (reg and +P) and all ran 100%. Accuracy seems really good and it carries well enough, I carry OWB and the aluminum frame really cuts weight.
 
If it werent for my Kimber Pro Carry 2, this would be on top of my list. The aluminum frame guns are great for carry :D I'm glad to see Ruger making more versions.
 
I have the older P220 ST (Stainless) and a newer P220 Nitron. The ST is significantly heavier, but in my opinion there is little difference in the recoil.

Although, I have never thought of the .45 ACP as having significant recoil in a full size handguns. I can't see where the elongated beaver tail would have much if any connection with recoil.
 
Although, I have never thought of the .45 ACP as having significant recoil in a full size handguns. I can't see where the elongated beaver tail would have much if any connection with recoil.
Click to expand...

IMO, a beavertail offers more than just slide bite protection. It enables you to get a higher grip on the handgun than would normally be possible with the same make/model handgun that doesn't have a beavertail. A grip that is as close as possible to the axis of the bore would make the recoil pulse (and muzzle flip) much more manageable.
 
IMO, a beavertail offers more than just slide bite protection. It enables you to get a higher grip on the handgun than would normally be possible with the same make/model handgun that doesn't have a beavertail. A grip that is as close as possible to the axis of the bore would make the recoil pulse (and muzzle flip) much more manageable.
Click to expand...

In my experience, the beaver tail just makes it eaiser to get the same grip on every draw. It doesn't change my normal grip at all.
 
The only reason I'd opt for an aluminum frame over a steel one on any pistol platform is if I intended on carrying it on a regular basis. If so, it's probably a good idea. If not (i.e., the pistol is intended for target duty or otherwise), not so much a good idea.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top