Ruger Red Hawk .44 vs S&W m 29

B

barnettamb

New member
Hey guys im looking into a .44 magnum and love the look of the model 29 and i love the history that goes with it. ive heard some bad things about the new smiths. i also like the look of the ruger, so does anyone have an opinion.
 
While some knock the new S&W guns I don’t think you really have anything to worry about from a quality standpoint. The gun is also backed by a fine organization that will certainly take care of you if a problem did arise

The Rugers are also nice guns and have excellent customer service backing them up as well.

Be aware that some ammunition manufacturers specifically state not to use their higher power ammo in a S&W gun. For most people this will never be a problem, but if you think you might ever want to try hotter loads the Ruger might be a better choice.

https://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_detail&p=54
 
If you're more sensitive to recoil, the Redhawk. It weighs around 52oz in 7.5", compared to 48oz in a Smith. Full house rounds in a Smith were at the limit of my recoil tolerance, but I can shoot a SBH or Redhawk very comfortably. I agree with others about using top loads. My Smith always showed pressure long before my SBH.
 
I've owned both a Ruger 44 Redhawk and a S&W Model 29. The trigger on the Smith is superior to the Ruger. However, if you want to shoot heavy loads on a regular basis - Ruger. The Model 29 I had was sent back to Smith twice to be fixed from shooting maximum loads in it - which is why I bought the Redhawk. I also agree that the Redhawk give less felt recoil.

You can't go wrong with either of them - just evaluate how you're going to use the gun, and pick the one that fits your usage.
 
I've owned both, but only the Redhawk remains. My 629 tried to be a true 44, but never quite reached the calibers full potential.
 
"....with an awesome trigger, smoother than silk."
Click to expand...

Uh...huh...well, when you can have a gunsmith tune your Redhawk trigger to 6.5 lbs double action and 2.5 lbs single action and have the gun run 100% - get back to me. The Ruger triggers aren't bad, they're nearly equal to the Smith when both are from the factory, but you cannot tune the Ruger like you can with a Smith.

My 629 tried to be a true 44, but never quite reached the calibers full potential.
Click to expand...

That's the problem with the Smith Model 29's - they don't hold up well to heavy loads. I have a Smith M57 .41 magnum that is a wonderful revolver, but I don't shoot heavy .41 loads based upon my past experience with the Model 29.

I also have a Smith .44 Special (Model 624 / Lew Horton), and that's about the load level that is comfortable for an "N" frame.
 
Last edited:
Buy a ruger red hawk or super red hawk. Stronger handgun with less chance of getting a ****. S&W is not as good as in some years gone by.
 
Both are fine. The Smith has a better trigger. The Redhawk will stand up to heavy loads better. But I no longer push magnums to the limit. I would probably look for a prelock Smith.
 
I have two model 29s and one Redhawk. The Smiths are 6 inch the Redhawk is a blue 5.5.

The Smiths are stock and the trigger on the Ruger has been worked on.

I like all of them and would be hard pressed to pick a "better" gun. I shoot factory and handloads in all of them.

I never could shoot a SBH and have had three of them. The double action guns are pretty good and a little work on the Redhawk trigger is a plus.

I won't be getting rid of any of them.
 
I hate when other people do this, but... did you attempt even the most casual search on this topic? It gets asked once a week.
 
I prefer a model 29 or 629 with 4" barrel and this is why there are choices because everyone has to decide for themselves what are the most important features for their needs ! Mine is an easy to carry in the field revolver that being my rifle is my main gun for hunting ! Others want strictly a hunting revolver that can handle the hottest loads or for extended shooting such as at silhouette matches ! Every ones needs are different....I have an older 629 that has easily seen at least 2000 rounds of factory loads and reloads approaching factory load pressures and have no desire or need to shoot anything hotter to cleanly harvest medium game up to 50 yds or so !
 
I hate when other people do this, but... did you attempt even the most casual search on this topic? It gets asked once a week.
Click to expand...

It's a public forum. Even with research of previous material one may want updated input and an opportunity for newer members to put their two cents worth into the often verbal fray.
 
Post#8

buckhorn_cortez

Uh...huh...well, when you can have a gunsmith tune your Redhawk trigger to 6.5 lbs double action and 2.5 lbs single action and have the gun run 100% - get back to me. The Ruger triggers aren't bad, they're nearly equal to the Smith when both are from the factory, but you cannot tune the Ruger like you can with a Smith.
Click to expand...

Well, I don't own a Performance Center 29/629, but, I did buy a PC 327 R8, and a PC 627 V-Comp new OOB, and my (for what I know, used 95%++) stock Ruger RH 5.5" Blued 44mag is right on par with those two S&W's for trigger pull, all nice might I ad.

And let's not talk about what I paid for each of these gun's! LOL
 
Good thread and very interesting. The Model 29 is an iconic revolver a'la "Dirty Harry" but I have to say that when I handle both the Ruger seems like a better firearm. Even if you do not shoot hot loads the Ruger is designed to stand up to use better, it seems to me.
 
It really boils down to what you want. I got the 629PC because I want quality over everything else. The metallurgical differences are distinct, cast vs forged. I have no need to push the envelope and use the most powerful loads known to man, if that were the case I would not use a 44 magnum.
 
I agree with Nanuk ... my 6-1/2" 629 fits my needs perfect for a .44 magnum revolver that I use for hunting and target use. I do not look to use the highest power loads money can buy. I have used Buffalo Bore ammunition without any problems surfacing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top