ligonierbill
New member
Anyone have anything good or bad to say about these? I wonder about the 20" barrel, but they interest me. And "I don't have one. "
Pretty much like about every other traditional sporting rifle.With Ruger No. 1's, the fit of the stocks could be an issue.
With Ruger No. 1's, mounting optics can be a challenge.
But just where your eye relief needs to be depends again on the fit of the stock
With an optic and it's higher sight plane, your cheek won't be supporting the rifle stock. The comb is too low.
with the scope covering the top of the breech, and the comb riser blocking the back of the breech, getting the cartridges into the breech could get more and more challenging.
Saw they were chambering a .25 Bob in it...
That's gun magazine talk for the 257 Roberts.And just what is a .25 Bob ???
That's gun magazine talk for the 257 Roberts.
And just what is a .25 Bob ???
That's gun magazine talk for the 257 Roberts.
IF by some chance you mean the .257 Roberts, show a bit of respect for Ned Roberts and the cartridge he created and call it by its proper name.
I think a better one would be the "No.2" as some have named the idea, a No.3 action with a stock more like the No.1. Though I can only shudder at the nicknames a "No.2" would get, especially if you got one that shot like crap. No.4 would be a "safer" model name, I think.
So he cut the curl off, forming a lever more like a Sharps than a Winchester.