Just a heads up to all Ruger Mark IV owners with pistols manufactured prior to 6/1/17:
https://ruger.com/dataProcess/markIVRecall/
https://ruger.com/dataProcess/markIVRecall/
Last edited:
That's why there's a rule about never pulling the trigger unless you intend to fire the gun.Years back I found my own 22 pistol [ not Ruger ] would fire when safety was released after safety was checked
The more likely scenario would be pulling the trigger thinking the safety was fully disengaged and then flicking the safety fully off. If you practice the firearms rules of safety, no serious problem but nobody wants a gun going off when it is not intentional.That's why there's a rule about never pulling the trigger unless you intend to fire the gun.
There's no logical reason to "check the safety" on a loaded gun.
First, let me say, I like Rugers. I have several (including a 22/45 Lite MKIV) and I will continue to buy them, but this it classic Ruger.
Design
Build
Ship
Test
Recall
Failures are rarely engineering failures. They're almost always bean-counter failures.Not to get too far off topic....Working as a manufacturing engineer I can tell you that is where management looks to cut costs first. Their priority is getting product to market, first.
Although only a small percentage of pistols appear to be affected and we are not aware of any injuries, Ruger is firmly committed to safety and would like to retrofit all potentially affected pistols with an updated safety mechanism.
I had been doing trigger work on my pistol when I found the problem .It was not loaded and the problem was from the factory not me !! I fixed it permanently ! Playing with the trigger ? You MUST know what you're doing !