Ruger LC9s: 1000 Round Range Report

ninjarealist

New member
Hey folks, long time TFL lurker and first-time poster here. I posted this range report on another forum (not a gun forum) and then I had the thought that maybe TFL would have some opinions about an edited version of the range report.

Full disclosure. I'm a relatively inexperienced gun owner. But perhaps my thoughts might still have some value to you.

Summary: So far I think this is a really nice shooter and all around great gun for the low price of $300, although I have encountered some minor reliability issues.

OepNABp.jpg


The Good: First and foremost, this gun is a very sweet shooter. As small as this pistol is, I'm shooting it more accurately and instinctively than any of the duty or compact sized pistols I've owned or shot, which is admittedly a lot less than most of you probably. Part of this is attributable to the trigger, which IMO is very nice. Not sure anything more needs to be said about the trigger in this gun. I'm sure you've heard it all.

Also, the ergos are excellent. The extension on the magazine gives you just enough grip to put all your fingers on the handle (unless you have especially large hands) and the handle is a great width. I'm not sure if others will have the same experience but the gun points very naturally for me. The sights seem to come into alignment almost immediately when I bring the gun up. The safety is also very easy to dis-engage and comparably quite difficult to re-engage, which IMO, is exactly what you would want in a safety if you choose to carry with manual safety on.

The Bad: While the gun itself has good ergonomics, the magazine assembly leaves a lot to be desired. The magazine disconnect seems to interfere with the magazine release. I'm a fan of magazine disconnects when they work well, but this one not so much, although I still think the safety value doesn't quite justify removing it. The magazine is relatively difficult to load and has to be tapped a lot to reseat the rounds. I appreciate the loose fit of the magazine, because I understand how this can be conducive to reliability, but I don't appreciate how easily the magazine extension can slide forward, although this shouldn't be an issue if you're handling the gun properly. One other minor gripe with the ergonomics is that serrations on the slide are too aggressive and cause minor abrasions after long range sessions. However, they do their job.

The Ugly: Even after 1000 rounds, this gun does not feed hollow points well. Maybe after I break it in more, this will change. I still haven't messed around with some of the expensive upper-tier hollow points but I might give that a try. Also, this gun must be wiped down extremely well, which is not easy due to the way it's designed. The spring is a pain to clean properly as is the slide and the frame. If there is any visible lubricant whatsoever on the gun, it will have reliability issues. That has been my experience. Otherwise, the gun has preformed flawlessly and I would absolutely trust my life to it if it was properly wiped down and loaded with FMJ, but these are serious concerns that need to be mentioned.

OLDiIOh.jpg


Overall: This gun has some minor reliability hiccups and the problems with hollow points might be a big issue for people who swear by hollow points. I'm not one such person, but if I was, and I was more mechanically-inclined, I might try polishing the feed ramp. But I have no problems sticking with FMJ which has been 100% reliable minus the wipe down issue mentioned above.

I'm inclined to over look these issues because I can't say enough about how well this gun shoots. Aimed shooting, point shooting, single shots, successive shots, this little gun can do almost everything you want a pistol to do. I'm far from a competition shooter, or even an especially experienced handgun shooter and I had no problems putting my targets center of mass in both aimed and point shooting.

2cUZy9O.jpg


(point shooting in two-round and three-round successions at 20 feet. this is nothing to write home about but I think it shows that this gun is easy for a novice gun owner to shoot well despite being such a small 9mm)
 
Jim,

I do most of my pistol shooting at TG and G of Kentucky. Great folks. Manage to have an atmosphere that is both safe and low-key. And their prices are more than fair.

I have been worried though with all of the reports of lead poisoning.from indoor ranges, but the closest outdoor range is just a much longer drive and the conveyor belt for the targets at the indoor range is a nice feature.

Or did you mean at what distance was I shooting?

That was at 20 ft, but it wasn't aimed shooting. I was practicing point shooting in two and three round successions. As I mentioned in the post, that's not exactly spectacular accuracy and I'm sure many people on this site could do much better.

I realize that many people don't practice point-shooting or write the technique off entirely, and I'm not trying to start a debate about point-shooting, but I just used the example of a point-shooting target to illustrate how naturally the gun points in my hand. The grip feels excellent and it's almost like the gun is sliding into the right parts of my hand.
 
I used to despise the lc9, but the other day I played around with a striker-fired like yours, and I agree, the trigger is insanely better than the old DAO, I would even consider exceptional for a pocket-nine. I will actually consider buying one now. but as small as it is, this will be for conceal carry only, so it absolutely MUST fire hollow-points reliably. I am sure I could get it work with polishing and such, but if that ;s a common out-of-the-box issue, I will have to re-consider. as a self-proclaimed novice shooter, you seem to know your terminology and functioning of a firearm very well. thanks for the post. I value everyone's opinion
 
I am pleased with my LC9 also. I can hold onto it okay even with my extra-large hands. The trigger and accuracy are more than good enough for its purpose. I have had no malfunctions. Thank you for the good review.
 
@skizzums

Thanks for the positive feedback.

I haven't tested this gun with great ammo because I have no problems carrying FMJ in the role I intend to use it. So simply using better ammo might clear up the issue, although I will say that the gun did feel extremely stiff when I received it and definitely felt like it needed some break-in time. It runs a lot smoother now but still jams on about every fifth hollow point. The rounds get trapped between the slide and the feed ramp. Whereas when you run the gun without wiping it down fastidiously it has had FTEs in my experience. I haven't had a single FTF with FMJ in over 800 rounds of FMJ.

I've heard of people having success with polishing the feed ramp and searching for the right HP ammo, but I haven't tried either yet.
 
@tallball Thanks for the positive feedback.

@skans I believe the two stage trigger is designed to prevent negligent discharges caused by anything other than a human finger. Primarily, I believe this is meant to mitigate discharges upon reholstering caused by materials getting lodged into the holster.

I haven't tested this feature yet :D

@jglsprings As skizzums said I was shooting at 20 feet: point-shooting not aimed shooting.
 
Odd about the JHP not feeding. Every LC9 I have shot has fed any JHP. Everybody LC9 owner I know has no problem with JHP. Odd that the LC9S would have a problem. Did Ruger have to change the angle or length of the feed ramp in the LC9S?

Jim
 
@btmj

I don't own and have never even shot the original LC9 so I can't speak to the differences in feed ramp. I haven't been able to find a good side-by-sde comparison of the feed ramp but from this side-by-side comparison (not my pictures) the barrels seem to be identical to my untrained eye:

LC9s

CZFysSQ.jpg


LC9

qSpAC74.jpg


However I will say that in researching this problem I have read of other people encountering it. The nose of the bullet lodges into the side of the feed ramp and the bullet gets stuck. Sometimes the bullet will slam into the feed-ramp, stick for a second and then continue on into the chamber. However, after an impact like that, I'd think setback would be too big of a concern so those bullets have all gone straight into the trash.
 
Unless your handloading w/o a crimp, I doubt any setback would be found. I takes a lot of pounds to push in a factory bullet.
 
Unless your handloading w/o a crimp, I doubt any setback would be found. I takes a lot of pounds to push in a factory bullet.
 
The recoil spring is pretty stout though and the round slams into the feed ramp at full force. I'm not doubting your knowledge on this subject, just emphasizing that it is quite a hard impact (I chamber slingshot style so) just to raise the question of whether this might be a case where the impact might be significant enough to cause setback.
 
you could be right. regardless, it's a problem they need to solve if they want their gun tae seriously. I love the ergo's and the trigger. I don't expect refine perfection in a pocket nine, but reliability is number one. the shield is going to be a tough gun to beat for the budget carry pieces
 
Traded my original LC9 for the new LC9s. Sorry to hear you're having problems with JHP's. Mines shot everything I've put through it. Totally reliable, very accurate, great trigger, excellent size/power ratio. Love it.
 
@sigxder Maybe I just got lucky and got one with rough machining on the feed ramp. Or maybe I just need to get some better hollowpoints. What type of JHP ammo have you had success with? All of it?
 
I'm a relatively inexperienced gun owner. But perhaps my thoughts might still have some value to you.
that's a bit of an understatement. in another post, you said you go shooting a lot. you must have some experience with handling guns. downplay on your experience?

your report on the ruger lc9 kindda makes me want to try shooting one seeing how accurate this gun could be despite its small size

anyway, welcome to the forums...ninja
 
Back
Top