Rossi 461 and 462, 357 Snubby's

Marshall-1

New member
I am curious of the opinions here on these revolvers? The lack of recommendations of them in the latest snubby posts probably answers my question?


I have decided on a S&W 4" for my primary carry gun (still deciding as to which one) but, I have found myself also eyeballing snubby's. :D I can see where these would really be handy to carry in many situatuions. You see, I knew this would happen to me when I started buying handguns again, they are addicting! I also have this mental disease with rifles and shotguns, not to mention fishing rods, reels and tackle. Oh well, keeps me off the streets and out of the bars, ;) .


Thank you,
Marshall
 
I have a 462 and love it! This is in addition to having Smith models 60 and 686 as well as a Ruger GP141.

My 462 appears to be either and older model (bought new) or a transitional vintage built just after Taurus bought them out. It has the Taurus lock on the hammer but also has a hammer mounted firing pin. The trigger pull is smooth, in both double and single action. I had to switch from 158 grain .357s to 125 grain .357s due to shooting high with the 158 grain loads. Brought the point of impact down considerably. I shoot defensive practice double action out to 7 yards successfully and the gun is death on steel plates at 25 yards, just have to adjust point of aim slightly low even with the 125 grainers (trigger actuator) (who says snubbies are not accurate). The gun is as accurate as any other snubbie.

I'm sold on it. Carry it more than my Smith model 60. It holds one additional round and is much more comfortable to shoot. Egonomics are better than the Smith and the shape makes it a little easier to conceal although it is a slightly larger revolver.

There may be lemons out there, but my 462 sure is sweet.
 
Thank you Arub,

I hadn't realized they were bought by Taurus until after I posted. I saw there website and kinda figured they had beed.

By the way, I have an ex co-worker that lives in LA. Lower Alabama is a nice place. I am in Oklahoma around the Tulsa area so, don't get down there as much as I would like. Eastern Ok is a great place to live as as long as no more people move here, LOL.

Thanks for your reply!

Marshall
 
I have had 2 Rossi 462's in the last year. The first one was great until it locked up permanently after 200 rds or so. I exchanged it for another 462. Despite the problem though it was a very good quality gun in terms of fit/finish. The replacement 462 doesn't have nearly the finish or workmanship as the first, yet shoots much more accurately and closer to point of aim, so I'm happy with it.

I have had some problems with the new 462, but all were related to a screw coming loose and the ejector rod unscrewing itself. Once I realized what was going on and tightened them, no more problems of any kind. But both caused sudden and complete catastrophic failures to operate. I'm glad I was only at the target range.

As long as nothing else goes wrong with it, and I can maintain its reliability, I'll be happy with it for what I paid. SA trigger is excellent, as good as any, and double action is light and smooth save for a slight hitch right at the beginning of the pull, causing a harder pull on some chambers and totally screwing up one-handed DA firing because I pull though it too quickly to overcome the hitch. I feel it's a minor gunsmithing issue, but just haven't gotten around to fixing it.

Size/weight/balance are "just right" for me; I feel it has better ergonomics than the similar Smith or Ruger offerings. It seems to absorb .357 recoil extremely well, to the point that firing it is actually fun with 110 gr. Winchester white box.

Sights are big and useable but like on any fixed-sight revolver, they are miserable and worthless for fast, accurate acquisition. I hate trying to shoot groups with it, since I get so tired of struggling with the sights, and even then the resulting groups are about 6" too low at 15 yds.

Would I use it for self-defense? Frankly, these guns are a little rough around the edges. For a gun this cheap I would want to shoot it quite a bit to work out the bugs, and then it still might break when you most need it. Even at its best it probably won't shoot to point-of-aim completely or be easy to shoot accurately.

Conclusion? While a nice, surprisingly accurate pistol, I would advise you to pass due to the high probability of getting a lemon and the PITA Taurus servicing you'll require (I'm one of those people you've heard about who sent a gun back 3 times to Taurus and still never got it to function).

I think I'll sell mine and get an S&W 66 or 686 with some good visible adjustable sights and no worries about quality or reliability going to hell.
 
Grapeshot,


Thank you for your reply. I believe I will pass on a Rossi. After a review like that, a man would be hard pressed to "rely" on one! I appreciate your honesty, many will say any product they bought is a great one, regardless. I say that and no way imply it towards Arubs favorable response!

Thanks for the heads up!


Marshall
 
You're very welcome Marshall.

If there's one thing I've learned concerning firearms, you usually get exactly what you paid for. Cheap pistols are bettter than nothing, but almost never turn out to be suitable for long-term serious use or shooting satisfaction, IMHO.

Like my Rossi, there are usually some very good reasons they cost significantly less, and owning one makes you really appreciate the extra little touches of quality the big makers build into their products.

The extra $100 it will cost you to get a better sixgun will seem mighty insignificant when the chips are down and you need to save your bacon. Heck, in my case even ensuring trouble-free range use would be a good reason to get a Smith or Ruger. If you have to save $, go for a used sample.

Happy Shooting!
 
Back
Top