Rosie O’Donnell: The Second Amendment is 'Not Really a Right'

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why an I not surprised?

Rosie blew her stand-up career, her own show, and now has infected The View. Hopefully, she'll get canned fairly soon and we won't have to listen to her any longer.
 
Good, let's take the guns away from the paid protection specialists who guard her little adopt-a-brats. :mad: See how she likes not having the right to have guns used to protect her and hers.

No one has that right, after all... :rolleyes:


-azurefly
 
O’Donnell: "Well, what about this? The firearm death rate among children in America 0 to 14 is 12 times higher then all 25 other industrialized nation combined. Combined."

The moron doesn't even know how to use the terms she throws around (much like what she says about "AK47s").

First she says "death rate" which you would think means something about X in 100,000 population. (That's the way the statistics usually deal with "rates" like crime and killing.)

Then she talks about # of times higher than other nations combined. Sounds at that point like she's talking about raw numbers.

What a marooooon!

-azurefly
 
who cares that big fat liberal lard has to say
. No argument here. I often vote for liberal issues (e.g., healthcare, childcare, public welfare, etc), but don't even think of infringing on my 2nd amendment rights.
 
Rosie O'Donnell should have quit while she was ahead, playing the 'straight man' to Madonna in A League of Their Own. That is about the last time she was funny, and ...oh, come to think of it, she wasn't funny there either...

:barf: :barf: :barf: consider the source, right?

Springmom
 
Good, let's take the guns away from the paid protection specialists who guard her little adopt-a-brats. See how she likes not having the right to have guns used to protect her and hers.

No one has that right, after all...


-azurefly
The problem is that you'll never see her bring a guest on that would bring that point up because she knows there's absolutely no counter to it. :rolleyes: Much like DiFi managing to skate by the questions regarding her own personal CCW as well as all the Chicago Aldermen that are the only citizens in Illinois Daley feels deserve to be armed.

One problem I do have is with this opinion:

Whether O’Donnell likes it or not, the right to own a gun is in the Second Amendment of the Constitution.
Yeah, whoop dee do. We already know the liberals don't care about what the Constitution says so in order to have any kind of argument comparing cars to guns we MUST be able to use something other than "but it's in the Constitution!". That's good enough for us but to rely on that against people who don't care about the Bill of Rights is pointless at best and counter-productive at worst.
 
We do have a counter to the cars-to-guns comparison. Bring up the fact that if you get a license to drive a car, you get to drive it ANYWHERE in all fifty states -- and you can even drive it in other countries with cooperation from those countries.

You can commit numerous infractions with that license using a car and still continue to be licensed and drive.

The state cannot discriminate or use "discretion" in whether to give you a license: if you meet objective criteria, you get the license.

If you drive only on private property, you may do so without being required to get a license.


-azurefly
 
skeeterj said:
No argument here. I often vote for liberal issues (e.g., healthcare, childcare, public welfare, etc), but don't even think of infringing on my 2nd amendment rights.


Skeeter, who do you find to vote for who does what you want about those issues, but who does NOT trample on your Second Amendment rights?

I dare say you must have a devil of a time making decisions regarding who to vote for.

In fact, I have to suspect that if you "vote for liberal issues," you probably HAVE voted, numerous times, in favor of politicians who are hostile to your 2nd Am. rights. :(

Is that not the case?

Me, when I vote, I consider gun rights to be paramount: the economy is something that will not go forever under. It will always be around, to be improved in various ways. Same thing with health care, child care, etc. Our gun rights, however, need to be safeguarded first and foremost and then we can turn our attention to those other things. If we allow the gun rights to be lost, they won't be coming back...


-azurefly
 
There are some really good responses to that transcript on that link! (Some of them put stuff you find here to shame!)

Pete-puma wrote:
You gotta love liberals. The Constitution just never means what it says and never says what it means. They are so intellectually corrupt they cannot find a right written as clearly as possible, but they seem to find the rights to gay marriage, abortion and healthcare when none of those words appear within 10 miles of the document.

And Hunter12 said:
Liberals aren't saying take away all guns, they can keep theirs. They're saying that the majority of us aren't smart or trustworthy enough to have guns. I bet the guard at the entrance of Rosie's gated community has a big gun strapped at his waist. I live in Illinois and we used to have a senator who traveled around the state preaching gun control. He traveled with at least four state policemen in his escort and I can assure you, they were armed. He was too stupid to see the contradiction or else he felt that he was worthy of protection and we didn't deserve the ability to protect ourselves.

Wow! Well said!


-azurefly
 
Well then neither is the 1st amendment, or any of the other amendments.

I hope a government agent busts into her house and duct tapes her mouth shut, takes all of her bodyguard's UZIs, searches her home without probable cause or warrant, and quarters his buddies in her house without consent. Then she can be marched off to a slow and drawn out trial without an indictment by a grand jury, forced to testify against herself without a lawyer present etc etc.

Maybe then she could see how ****ing horrible our lives would be without those amendments and the Constitution.

"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

How hard is the sentence: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" to understand? The second I saw the this constitutional amendment I knew exactly what it meant, that the people are the militia, and since they are necessary to the security of a free state (either actual state, or a state of freedom, doesn't matter), they have the right to keep and bear arms. Wildalaska will be in here shortly to correct me though.

Then there are people like Bill Maher, the "libertarian", who says that because they are amendments they can be taken out and/or drastically altered.

photo-bill-maher-2.jpg

090305c.jpg


They look suprisingly similar.
 
Rosie blew her stand-up career, her own show, and now has infected The View. Hopefully, she'll get canned fairly soon and we won't have to listen to her any longer.
AMEN! I can't think of a crappier show that deserves it better either.

A bunch of women sitting around a table talking over each other, or giving each other 10 seconds at best to develop a point, is the exact OPPOSITE of how real men settle things (men prefer one on one instead of group"think" or any group dynamic, otherwise known as the mob/democracy). The "view" is like a minature version of the U.N. and a carbon copy of that type of thinking that accomplishes ZIP. I know of a physican with a national radio show who points out that women have an interesting "shunning" instinct. They will form a group (a kind of mental collective) and almost randomly pick ONE female in the group to be the target of shunning. Star was targeted and I am CONVINCED that those hypocrites/liars did it because she was black. There is also a very clear hierarchy within groups of females. All of this is easy to see, but the politically correct thought police keep society (especially men) from discussing it. Cleary Ba Ba Wa Wa sees herself as "queen bee" in this little group. Not long after the lezbo gym teacher (rosie) arrived, Barbara abruptly changed the seating order. She pretended that it was "to try something new," but when I watched the video of it on Jimmy Kimmel, anyone and everyone could see through her phoniness/lies.

Rosie appears hell bent on taking over the group as if she still has her own show. Either Barbara will allow the takeover (grudgingly) or will see to it that rosie is gone. Either way, more fireworks are coming.
 
It makes me chuckle to think that "The View" is actually "infect-able" by the likes of O'Donnell. As if previously it had been a major respectable think-tank on ANY issue.

But, go, go, gadget Liz Hasselbeck! Good job by her. :)
 
Grats to the two who stood up to Rosie the bully. Its obvious that Ms. ODonnell doesnt believe in the other 10 amendments also.
 
Well, we all know what Rosie is. I don`t need to say anything more about her. Did you notice that almost all of the comments that are posted on that link are anti-Rosie. HAHAHA.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top