Just picked up a Romanian SKS (circa 1957) over the weekend at a local gun show. I could have paid $100 more at the same gun show and gotten a nearly mint Russian SKS (circa 1952).
I went with the Romanian because I was looking for a shooter (Romanian), and not a collector's piece (Russian). Plus, with the $100 I saved I was also able to buy a synthetic stock, a handful of stripper clips, an extra complete bolt, a carry strap, and a replacement bolt return spring.
I'm happy with my purchase, but I was just curious on how the Romanians compare with the Russian SKS's. The fit and finish seems a step down from the Russian, but I am more interested in anyone's experience with actual performance of the Romanian version vs. the Russian version. Any thought would be appreciated. Thanks.
I went with the Romanian because I was looking for a shooter (Romanian), and not a collector's piece (Russian). Plus, with the $100 I saved I was also able to buy a synthetic stock, a handful of stripper clips, an extra complete bolt, a carry strap, and a replacement bolt return spring.
I'm happy with my purchase, but I was just curious on how the Romanians compare with the Russian SKS's. The fit and finish seems a step down from the Russian, but I am more interested in anyone's experience with actual performance of the Romanian version vs. the Russian version. Any thought would be appreciated. Thanks.