I went over to Home Depot today, to rent a carpet cleaner. While in the Tool Rental area, I overheard another customer talking with the desk clerk about a robbery that went down the previous week at their location.
Apparently, some Army guys from Fort Bragg had gone there to rent a ladder. They were putting the ladder on the roof of their government van when they saw a guy coming at them from the treeline across the parking lot section outside Tool Rental. The guy pulled a gun on them and robbed them.
So, this turned into a discussion of how the military's policy of not allowing personal weapons to be carried on base has inadvertently flagged military personnel who are obviously going to or coming from bases as ideal robbery targets. Odds are extremely high that they are unarmed, or that any weapons will be secured in locked cases in cargo compartments.
How backwards is it when the safest victims are military people? Just a pet peeve of mine...
Of course, I'd just love to see somebody try this with MP's, CID, or NCIS types by mistake. There are at least some exceptions, luckily.
Apparently, some Army guys from Fort Bragg had gone there to rent a ladder. They were putting the ladder on the roof of their government van when they saw a guy coming at them from the treeline across the parking lot section outside Tool Rental. The guy pulled a gun on them and robbed them.
So, this turned into a discussion of how the military's policy of not allowing personal weapons to be carried on base has inadvertently flagged military personnel who are obviously going to or coming from bases as ideal robbery targets. Odds are extremely high that they are unarmed, or that any weapons will be secured in locked cases in cargo compartments.
How backwards is it when the safest victims are military people? Just a pet peeve of mine...
Of course, I'd just love to see somebody try this with MP's, CID, or NCIS types by mistake. There are at least some exceptions, luckily.