Road rage and the exacted retribution

jimpeel

New member
The case was found to be self defense and the entire thing was caught on the 911 tape as the girlfriend of Buspo was on the cell phone to the cops. They are very fortunate that the cell phone was not their sole weapon or their weapon of choice.

This from the Colorado Springs Gazette (~7-2-99)

'Road rage' in eye of beholder

Debate focuses on shooting

By Eric Gorski/The Gazette
Story editor Valerie Wigglesworth; headline by Rhonda Van Pelt

The term is a catch phrase rather than a legal definition, a quick and easy way to capture the angst that can entangle the harried 1990s driver: road rage.

It makes for a snappy headline or lively water-cooler talk.

Applying it to real events can be as tricky as negotiating construction on Interstate 25.

On Thursday, the 4th Judicial District Attorney's Office received the completed police reports on an incident that's provoked debate about what qualifies as road rage: a shooting last week between two
motorists that left one man dead.

Detectives have raised the possibility that the fatal shooting was self-defense. Assistant District Attorney Dave Gilbert said a decision about whether charges are warranted against the surviving driver may be
made by the middle of next week.

Lt. Ken Hilte, spokesman for the El Paso County Sheriff's Office, said last week the case didn't qualify as road rage. Someone else might look at those same facts and disagree.

"There is no widespread agreement on what road rage is," said Stephanie Faul, spokeswoman for the American Automobile Association's Foundation for Public Safety. "The term is quite fluid."

Though not all of the details have been released, Hilte said he still feels comfortable with his initial assessment of the July 1 incident that began with a fender bender and ended in homicide. Here's why:

John R. Harrell, 39, the driver of a red Dodge pickup that triggered the crash at Powers Boulevard south of Stetson Hills Boulevard, had a blood-alcohol level of .34, more than three times the legal limit,
toxicology results showed.

That was the likely reason Harrell rammed a blue Ford pickup driven by 37-year-old Christopher Bispo, Hilte said.

The two drivers didn't provoke each other with shouted words or aggressive driving before the crash - typical ingredients of road rage, Hilte said.

Second, Bispo said he gave chase not to exact revenge but to jot down the license plate number and call 911, Hilte said.

A few minutes later, Harrell pulled over on the shoulder of Dublin Boulevard just off Powers, and Bispo parked behind him.

According to witnesses, Harrell stepped out with a gun, Hilte said. Bispo announced that police had been called, then he retreated to his truck to get his weapon.

Detectives have not said publicly who fired first, Hilte said. Bispo was shot once in the abdomen and Harrell was fatally shot in the chest.

Some might argue that regardless of what happened before the shooting, it's still considered road rage because weapons were brandished and people were shot.

"I could see how someone would say, 'Someone's dead. This is the ultimate road rage,'" Hilte said. "There's an initial tendency to say, 'We have two guys driving down the highway slinging lead at each other.'
It wasn't like that."

John Larson, a psychiatrist and director of the Institute of Stress Medicine in Norwalk, Conn., argues road rage is the culmination of a series of retaliatory exchanges between irate drivers.

He even assigns "degrees" of retaliation. Only when one driver intentionally damages another driver's vehicle or injures another driver does the term road rage fit, Larson says.

Leon James, a University of Hawaii psychology professor who's studied driving behavior since 1977, defines road rage as "a persistent state of hostility behind the wheel, demonstrated by acts of aggression
on a continuum of violence, and justified by righteous indignation."

He does not believe an intentional violent act must occur for a confrontation to be called road rage. If a driver exacerbates a situation with a gesture or maneuver instead of driving away, that's road rage, he
says.

The American Automobile Association used the term "aggressive driving" when it released a major study on the subject in 1997.

The study, which found a 51 percent increase in such incidents from 1990 to 1996, defined the term as "events in which an angry or impatient driver tries to kill or injure another driver over a traffic dispute."

About a dozen states in the past year have adopted or considered laws that specifically address aggressive driving, James said. Colorado, which doesn't have such a law, has taken a different approach.

Trooper Chip Broshous, spokesman for the Colorado State Patrol, said troopers have de-emphasized catching speeders and increased ticketing for violations such as following too closely or improper
passing.

The state patrol and local police agencies also have singled out aggressive drivers with charges of reckless driving, a more serious offense than most traffic violations and one that requires a court appearance.

John Henry, co-chairman of Drive Smart Colorado Springs, a nonprofit that promotes traffic safety, said it makes sense that the public and the police might not agree on what qualifies as road rage.

"I think people pretty much use aggressive driving and road rage interchangeably," he said. "But to law enforcement, I think their concern is aggressive driving and at what point does that go over the line and
become out-and-out assault."
 
Detectives have not said publicly who fired first, Hilte said. Bispo was shot once in the abdomen and Harrell was fatally shot in the chest.

My source in the public defender's office says Harrell came out shooting, and Bispo dove back into his vehicle for his own gun.

FWIW.

------------------
"The right of no person to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property,
or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall be called into question.."
Article 11, Section 13, CO state constitution.
 
I hate to keep posting long posts but the story is off of the archive now.

No charges will be filed in shooting after crash

Traffic altercation led to man's death


By Bill McKeown / The Gazette
Story editor Cliff Foster; headline by Andy Obermueller

A Colorado Springs man wounded in a roadside exchange of gunfire won’t be charged in the death of a drunken motorist who attacked him, the 4th Judicial District Attorney’s Office said Wednesday.

Assistant District Attorney Dan May said Christopher Bispo, 37, acted in self-defense when he shot John Harrell with a 9 mm handgun at 7:30 p.m. July 1 at Dublin and Powers boulevards.

May said much of the altercation between Harrell and Bispo was seen by eyewitnesses or captured on a 911 dispatch tape.

That evidence, he said, indicated Bispo acted reasonably throughout the incident.

Bispo’s girlfriend used a cellular phone to report that a suspected drunken driver had bumped Bispo’s truck on Powers Boulevard. The couple was following him to get his license plate number. She stayed on
the phone with dispatchers through the incident.

An investigation by the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office detailed what happened next:

About a mile from where the fender bender occurred, Harrell pulled over and stopped.

Bispo pulled behind him, intending to wait for police to arrive. Harrell, though, quickly got out of his car carrying a .38-caliber revolver and started toward Bispo’s car.

Bispo retrieved his handgun from the back seat of his truck and yelled several times to the visibly intoxicated Harrell to stay in his car and wait for police to arrive.

Instead, Harrell, a Westminster resident, raised his gun and aimed it at Bispo, a civilian employee of Fort Carson.

While retreating to the rear of his truck, Bispo was shot once in the stomach by Harrell.

Bispo, who was a qualified sharpshooter with an M-16 rifle while he was in the Army, returned fire, striking Harrell in the heart. The gunplay took just seconds, investigators determined.

Bispo was hospitalized for more than a week at Penrose Hospital. He has been released.

May said under Colorado law, deadly force is justified when people believe they are in imminent danger of being killed or severely injured and when they believe a lesser degree of force is inadequate to deter
the threat.

Bispo, May said, certainly had reason to believe he could be killed — and in fact did suffer a serious injury.

It was clear after the investigation, May said, that a lesser degree of force would not have repelled Harrell.

May said Bispo would not be charged with a weapons violation.

There was insufficient evidence that Bispo was carrying the weapon concealed, and Colorado law allows people to carry a firearm in a vehicle as long as it is not hidden, he said.

May said investigators could not determine why Harrell reacted so violently — except that he had a blood-alcohol level of .34, more than three times the legal limit for drivers in Colorado. May said he could
not comment on whether Harrell had a criminal record.
 
These people crack me up: "road rage", defined literally, means "the act or state of becoming enraged while driving" - this happens all day every day to many people, and always has - happens to me once or twice a day. OTOH, intentionally trying to kill or hurt someone is called "assault and battery", regardless of the means, and always has. This second part is what has increased of late -- definitionally, nothing more than an increase in assaults & batteries (due to apparent inability to control tempers and not sweat the small stuff). Any other definition of that precise term is just people pulling stuff out of the air. That's like the SPLC saying a militia is a hate group. Why is it a hate group? Because it hates big centralized governments? Then I guess MADD is a hate group, becuase it hates drunk driving. "Hate group" is a made-up, BS term that really means very little or nothing.

The facts in this shooting are unclear whether the shooting was justified, but as an attorney, my advice to the DA would be don't waste your time - no jury is going to find him guilty of anything, when the other guy is .34 and apparently it is undisputed the knee-walking drunk guy brandished a gun first, unless of course you're in yankee-land or Calif where people think all guns and gun owners are evil and must be punished.

Personally, I get angry/enraged when someone threatens my safety by following too close. In fact, just yesterday, a bumper sticker idea dawned on me after this idiot female driver (gender is just coincidence of course) tailgaited me for a couple of miles - probably less than a half second behind me. So here's the bumper sticker:

"Please obey the 2 second rule: If you don't get off my ass in 2 seconds, I'll break your kneecaps"
 
Back
Top