not that anarchy
Anarchy is the answer, but not what Longshot suggests.
Individual Ancharism is self rule. Fighting for freedom must start with yourself. You have to learn what the principle of freedom entails, then you must act on it, i.e. apply your understanding.
As theBluesman says, don't advocate illegal actions in an electronic public forum. The reason being, the internet leaves big footprints for anyone to figure out who you are and where you live. You need to understand security and privacy on the net and how to protect yourself. For TFL, they can trace you through your email address.
One place that explains internet privacy and security rather well is
http://www.freedom.net Search the web for other info and products.
Having covered my tracks fairly well, I will publically state that illegal acts are necessary to be free. Again, this is for your liberty, it is not freedom to take someone else's freedom away, i.e. rob them, etc.
Main point: You have a decision to make on all laws - will I obey them or not? Don't automatically obey without thinking.
Obey those you agree with, measure the consequences of not obeying a law you disagree with. For some laws, the principle of freedom, security, etc., is more important than the consequences of disobeying. Disobey those you choose to. For example, you need a ccw permit to carry. Do you or don't you obey it? If I obey, my finger prints would be put into the FBI database. Law enforcement will know I carry. Positive - you won't go to jail for carrying. If you do obey and get a ccw, say there are areas listed you cannot carry. Do you obey that law (regulation) or not? Negative - you go unarmed and you need your gun. Or, your lifestyle is limited by not attending those places. Positive - you are not fined, etc., if searched while you're there.
You must understand that the laws are written such that no matter what you do, you are probably in violation of some law, ordinance, etc., right now. Make it an issue of living your life according to your decisions and not just automatically obey whatever laws are passed. For laws you do knowingly disobey, you must believe you are right and be comfortable with your action.
If you do not practice this decision making now, when the law is passed to take your guns, you will automatically obey. For personal defense against a criminal, you must already be at ease possibly killing someone to protect yourself and loved ones. If you are not willing to possibly kill state officials, most likely LEO, to keep your guns, then just give them the guns. You have considered the consequences and in your judgement, the principles of freedom are not worth fighting for. That's fine if that is your decision. For most people, it is much easier living as sheep.
To act freely is not free. Or as Voltaire said, "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."