Review: Vortex SPARC red dot sight

Sturmgewehre

New member
I just completed a review of the Vortex SPARC red dot sight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16ZB4itTusM

It's a great little optic for the price. I even bang it around a little in the video and the sight holds zero. If you're not wanting to spend $500+ on a red dot optic but you want quality construction and all the features of the more expensive models, I would check out the SPARC.

It also has a life time warranty.
 
Thanks Sturmgewehre.

I always enjoy your video's. I would be interested in a review of the Bushnell TRS-25. I was going to get one for use on my Ruger MarkIII 22/45.
(The main draw is that its even smaller than the Vortex Sparc and half the price)

I know you probably know a lot more about this "tactical" stuff than me so I would be interested in your opinion.
 
I happen to have ordered one about half an hour before you posted it, now I'm a bit more confident that I did the right thing. Thanks for the video.
 
Another really nice video.

One question: How do you best determine where on the rail to mount a red dot like that? Maybe it's the small size throwing me off but I feel like I usually see Aimpoints mounted further forward OR further rearward (I've never used one).

You certainly have me interested in the SPARC...
 
How do you best determine where on the rail to mount a red dot like that?

Non-magnifying CQB optics (red dots, holosights) are best off being placed as far forward as possible, but not on an unstable location (such as handguards that aren't securely bolted to the receiver) or where it just adds too much weight to the front of the rifle.

I generally put mine right at the front of the rail on an AR upper; the front of the mount is right where the receiver stops. Much further forward puts the weight in an uncomfortable spot (IMO).

The further forward, the better your field of view, but it's a balance between weight balance and field of view.
 
People used to put RDS's way out front, as far as they could. There was very little benefit to doing this and with older, larger sights it would negatively affect the balance of the rifle.

There are many things to consider. Take the rifle I have it mounted to in my review video (Bushmaster ACR). It has a forward charging handle which can cause issues if the sight is placed anywhere within its path. The same is true of the SCAR. With other rifles like the AR or XCR this isn't a consideration.

For me I like it about mid point, near the balance point of the rifle. This way you don't change the balance of the rifle unless you're purposely trying to. With the ACR, it's nose heavy anyway so mounting optics further rearward only serves to improve the balance of the rifle. I have it located on my rifle in the video in a neutral position.

If you look around, you'll find most people put them pretty close to right over the ejection port. The newer EOTechs, for example, are cut so that the bulk of the sight will sit over the ejection port of the M4 while the battery compartment will sit slightly over the slip-ring for the front handguard.

It's all a matter of personal preference really, I would move it around until it feels right. But as noted, be sure to mount it to something rigid like the receiver and avoid mounting it to handguards unless they are very well secured to the rifle.
 
Father Time,

Given the price of the Bushnell optic, and the popularity, I will pick one up and review it sometime soon. I have no real experience with it at this time, so I'll reserve comment until I have at least used one.
 
I've had one for about 6 weeks. I think you would have to spend at least double to get any better sight and it sure wouldn't be twice as good. Only time will tell if they will hold up, but all of the other Vortex products seem to be doing very well so I am hopeful that the SPARC will work as well.

I like the ability to adjust the dot down small. I was able to maintain 1.5" groups out to 100 yards. Pretty good for most red dot sights in my experience.
 
The Sparc looks neat. I am not sure about the 1 MOA adjustments and the NV setting doesn't appear to be true NV (IR spectrum), but just a very low brightness setting. For me, this is important because it would be used for night hunting hogs.

The single touch on switch is problematic, especially with the shorter battery life. Carried in a rifle bag, I can see the sight being accidently turned on and the battery run down.

The price is great and the special mentioned in the video makes it very attractive.
 
Last edited:
I had seen this advertised and became interested, but now I plan on purchasing one for an offset mount and plan on getting a variable powered scope for longer distances.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Went ahead and ordered this red dot for $179.00 including shipping.
 
Last edited:
The single touch on switch is problematic, especially with the shorter battery life. Carried in a rifle bag, I can see the sight being accidently turned on and the battery run down.

The SPARC actually has a 6-hour automatic shutoff, so accidentally leaving it on shouldn't run the battery down much. That said, it has never accidentally turned on in my rifle bag.
 
I can appreciate that the optic has never turned on in your rifle bag, but you might not even know. You just haven't found it that way.

I know, negative evidence doesn't wash. However, Vortex was worried enough about the sight getting bumped and turning off that they put a delay on the switch such that it won't deactivate by being bumped. That tells you that they have recognized the problem and have come up with a patch. The 6 hour delay is nice, but if at full power, that is nearly 5% of the projected battery life. If the rifle is riding around in a bag for a bunch of days and getting turned repeated, you can have a problem, but if you don't check, how would you know?

So of the other more expensive sights have gone with extreme run times. You can leave them on for years. The Aimpoint Micro is good for something like 5 years.

I have been with folks on 4 occasions now with Eotechs with auto shut-off features who had issues with dead batteries. Having to have auto shut-off means battery life if very limited and while the sight may be durable enough for self defense, the weak link would seem to be the battery. So folks think that having to turn on sights is a negative for self defense as well. So maybe the sight is a great plinking, gaming, hunting sight. There is nothing wrong with that. I think I will replace the T-1 on my S&W M&P 15-22 in fact with a Sparc.

Here is another positive review of it, BTW.
http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=2&f=277&t=187104
 
Received notice I will be getting my Sparc Thursday. Can't wait to take it to range this weekend to try it out. My Sig Sauer vertical grip laser/ light will be my backup sight in HD if I'm not able to get Sparc turned on quickly enough. The videos sold me on the Sparc as I've been wavering on the Aimpoint and EoTech, but the price helped me also.
 
Received my Sparc this morning(Thursday) and already installed it on my DD AR 15. Easy to install and my first impression is that it's hard to believe the Aimpoint and EoTech are worth three times more in price or three times better in quality. Will be testing it out this weekend as the weather will be nice.
Thanks Sturmgwerhe for the video review.
 
You're welcome, and I agree. The quality of the optic is hard to believe. You think that because it's $199 that perhaps it's cheap or constructed of second rate materials. It's not. I'm very impressed with the quality of the optic.

I just ordered a Vortex 6.5-20x44mm Viper scope to evaluate. If their scopes are anything like their RDS's, it will be a great optic for the price.
 
my first impression is that it's hard to believe the Aimpoint and EoTech are worth three times more in price or three times better in quality.

The Aimpoint T-1 gives you about -14-357 times the battery life than the Sparc and you don't have to worry about turning it off or turning it on for over 5 years. I have a couple that have been running near continuously for 2+ years. Already that means 5-145 times the run life of the Sparc.

In other words, quality may not be the only feature driving up the price.
 
With savings of 350+plus, I can buy a lot of batteries. I'm one who is pretty conscious of taking care of my guns and toys, but if I forget to turn it off it auto shuts down after six hours. It also turns on pretty quickly. I'm sure Aimpoint are great RD's and I may eventually get one but right now for $180.00 plus free shipping I couldn't turn this offer down. I may regret this RD but right now it seems like a bargain.
 
Got to take mine to the range today, first impression was very good. Nice range of brightness adjustment, from bright red for fast both-eye-open shooting and very controlled for zeroing against a black target. I have to play with parallax so, after zeroing my PS90 at 25 I not only had vertical but a lot of horizontal POI shift at 50.
One thing that miffed me a lot so was the cheap lens protector bikini, busted first time I tried to put it back on. Definitely need to find something different.
 
Got my Sparc a couple of days ago and finally got it to the range as well. From the onset, I would say I am pleased with the optic for $180-200.

Here is what I have observed thusfar.

All the gizmos and such that come with it are great. You can low mount, high mount, and there is an additoinal 1/8" riser to use with either mount. I needed it on the high mount to work best with NV. Cool.

Aside from the battery issue comparison with the Aimpoint T-1, the smaller diameter tube of the Sparc means less light transmission through the tube which means lower light situations will result in a slight increased difficulty in seeing the target without additional illumination.

Still don't like the switch given the short battery life. I would prefer an optic that takes a couple of seconds to turn on verus what the Sparc has.

The bikini cover actually doesn't seem to work that well once the optic is mounted. The bikini comes on the optic mounted in the best way possible, with one strap along the bottom of the optic where the mounts go. Once on the mounts, that option is removed and so getting the bikini on, properly placed, and off, is a pain.

The range of light settings is fairly limited. The lowest light setting is far too bright for lower light work where you can still see your target. I did not get a chance to do high noon testing of the bright end.

The NV setting worked amazingly well for being a single setting NV option. It worked okay with my NV scope so long as I didn't illuminate anything with my IR illuminator inside of about 15 yards or illuminate anything that was within about 25 and white. The dot got washed out. That aspect will vary depending on the illuminator, of course, but that was my experience with my gear. If there is sufficient ambient light to not use the IR illuminator, then the NV setting seems pretty good.

I mounted the Sparc on a S&W M&P 15-22 as it will be the eventual final home for it, though I plan on putting it on a .45-70 next. Zeroing went fine. The 1 MOA adjustments weren't too bad at all. On this gun and having 100 yards be about the furthest I will be shooting it, the 1 MOA adjustment is really a non-issue.

I liked the 2x magnifier, but do have a couple of complaints about it. First is that while sturmgewhre noted the fish eye effect, I didn't, but I did notice that the FOV is nearly cut in half. Maybe they added a ring inside the optic to cover the fish eye problem and I have a slightly different model. So the FOV is less. This isn't horrible, but not what I was expecting.

Second is that there is no sort of holder for the 2x magnifier to keep it clean when not in use. I put mine in a heavy duty ziplock bag to go in my range bag for now, but this isn't optimal.

I will play with it for a bit on the .22 and later transfer it to a .45-70 to see how it does. If it works well there, then I may see another one or two in my future, especially for my sporting guns.

FYI - I think the Aimpoint Micros have a bunch of shortcomings as well. I am not just picking on the Sparc. Sturmgewehre already pointed out all the good stuff. I am just pointing out some of the considerations that might give reason for a person to not buy it that more glowing reviews might not cover. The NV setting is a good example. It has it, but buying the scope because it has it would not be prudent because it is singular, not bright enough when used with in IR illuminator at shorter range, and so has limited usability.
 
Back
Top