Retired Top Military To Publically Back Bush

woodit

New member
----------
From: [deleted by request]
To: [woodit]
Subject: Interesting

From my Colonel cousin.......


> Subject: Retired Military Brass Poised to Back Bush
>
> "Several recently retired senior U.S. military
> officers, including three picked for top slots by
> President Clinton, plan to endorse George W. Bush
> for president, former Marine Commandant Charles
> Krulak said yesterday.
>
>
> "You're about to see a list that will blow your
> socks off," said Krulak, who himself was named by
> Clinton to lead the Marine Corps in 1995 and retired
> a year ago.
>
>
> Among those who will publically support Bush, he
> said, are Admiral Jay Johnson, who stepped down
> earlier this summer as head of the Navy; General
> Ronald R. Fogleman, who resigned his position as Air
> Force chief in 1997, and Marine General Anthony C.
> Zinni, who until he retired recently was head of the
> Central Command, which oversees U.S. military
> operations in the Mideast.
>
>
> Those three are especially significant because they
> were nominated for their top positions by Clinton.
> Until now most of the retired military officers who
> have been associated with the Bush Campaign have
> been veterans of the Gulf War, which was overseen by
> Bush's father, former President George Bush.
>
>
> In addition, said Krulak, Bush will be endorsed by
> two other service chiefs who served under Clinton,
> but were picked by the elder Bush: former Air Force
> Chief General Merrill McPeak, and former Marine
> Commandant General Carl Mundy.
>
>
> "For me, it's hard to forget the early impression
> made (by Clinton) that he and his Administration
> really didn't care about about National Security
> Policy" said McPeak, who retired as Air Force Chief
> in 1994.
>
> Krulak, who is co-chairman of a committee of
> veterans supporting Bush, said the list includes 85
> high ranking veterans. One reason so many recently
> retired generals signed up, he said, is that they
> were bothered by comments made by General Henry H.
> Shelton, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, that
> military readiness is good and that "national
> security is so important it should be above
> politics." Shelton was responding to criticisms Bush
> made at the Republican Convention last month."
>
> It is about time that the Brass has found that part
> of their anatomy that distinguishes them as men.
> General Shelton's quote is directly verbatium as to
> what President Clinton told his assembled Joint
> Chiefs of Staff in the Fall of 1998 when they
> collectively complained to him during his rare visit
> to the Pentagon about the state of military
> readiness, the active duty pay gap versus the
> civilian sector, the growing retention and
> recruitment problems, and the need for modernization
> of equipment.
>
> Clinton stared at the Chairman, and told him "OK,
> but let's not politicise these issues" (i.e., or you
> will be replaced). To his credit, Secretary Cohen
> told the President that "they are political issues,
> and will have to be dealt with in the near future."
> The details from that meeting were quitely spead
> down the chain of command via commander's calls by
> the service chiefs.
>
>
> What I would envision...as I have seen it during
> other elections, is an open letter to veterans,
> military personnel, and the general public, signed
> by those 85 high ranking folks, and published (via
> advertising) in the top 100 newspapers (plus the Air
> Force Times, Navy Times, etc.).
>
> E-mail will not be as effective, as the whole
> general public needs to be exposed to the
> endorsements. As the letter gets drafted, the
> campaign also needs to bring in some of our top
> enlisted retired folks and also discuss some of the
> concerns directly related to veterans.
>
> Readiness/pay are issues geared to 3.5 Million
> active duty; Veteran's health care and VA advocacy
> are issues geared to 27 Million veterans.)
>
> I am meeting with Norfolk Republicans and
> Congressional Candidate Ed Schrock tonight, again
> Friday night at a beach BBQ in Ocean View, and will
> head up to the DC area to meet with John and other
> Vets this Saturday morning.
>
>
> Warm Regards,
> Charlie

> [Charlie works at the Pentagon in N8. He's a
> retired 0-6 and served as a former President's military aide.]

>
 
I talked to a few fellows that got out recently and the Dems are not held in high regard. I think the military will be a clean sweep for W.

------------------
"In my opinion, anyone pushing through anti-gun legislation is a bloody traitor and should be sent up for treason" N.H. Stuart
 
1) They have to vote
2) Voter turn out overseas is ALWAYS low. Absentee Ballots are needed.
3) You won't see Gore or Clinton giving the military a GOTV effort that you see them give immigrants.

Got to spread the word. Most gov't have web sites to order Absentee Ballots now.

madison

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by mcshot:
I talked to a few fellows that got out recently and the Dems are not held in high regard. I think the military will be a clean sweep for W.

[/quote]
 
I'm afraid that the only folks to whom this support will appeal are the present supporters of Bush.

We can only hope that the pro-Bush folks are scared enough of Gore that they will show up at the polls...

Art
 
I think you have to take into account that (sadly), very few enlisted men vote. Most don't even know why or how. They see no connection to voting and their jobs, and those that do are usually pro-Gore, because if the military ever gets a commander-in-chief who gives a rats ===, he will start by firing all the yes men at the top. Then he will purge the next level. He will continue this until he gets those men at the bottom tier, who care more for soldiers than for their careers. What they lack in cunning can be made up by caring. I met very few officers who gave a tinkers damn about the individual troops. Seems like many senior NCO's were bitten by the career bug. I have to say that there are a majority of NCO's who care, but the minority who don't, tend to rise much faster because they're yes men. Yes men curry favor of superiors no matter the cost on subordinates. I fear the arrival of the next war (my guess is China). There will be an initial blood bath from our men because "there is no problem with the military, they are all happy, and morale is high". If the brass believes this, then I want them leading the assaults instead of directing the war from their stateside offices.
 
Back
Top