Tried 3 new ones and one that I tried previously. Shot at least 2 mags with each.
Last week I shot the G19-5 and didn't like the grip cutout as it stung my pinkie. This week I tried the Gen4 with the finger grooves. Actually had the same issue as I left my pinkie on the crease of the base of the grip. So, I had to adjust again. Of the four, I was the least accurate with the Glock. Maybe it's because I have to adjust my pinkie - on both the 4 and 5, or maybe the grip angle is an issue. I'm sure if I shot it enough, I would adjust to the grip angle. Shot it better than my Shield, but not by a lot as I'm improving with the Shield and saw much greater improvement with my 442 this week.
Next was the CZ75B. Felt good, but of course, heavy. Instantly more accurate than I was with the Glock. Nice pistol. I see why it's known as a good shooter. However, I would probably go with a 75D Compact if I was to purchase a CZ.
M&P9 2.0. I've previously shot the 9C 2.0 and .45 2.0 and they both felt good and were accurate for me. The 9 2.0 was more of the same. Felt good, shot good. On par with the CZ. However, I shot 2 mags and each had one failure to feed properly. That was disappointing, but with a rental gun, who knows. I really like the M&P 2.0's. They feel good, shoot good, and are priced right. I would probably go with the 9C 2.0, but there's not much difference in size between the full size and compact.
I liked the P320 last week so much, I decided to shoot it again. It didn't disappoint as it still feels great to me and was very accurate. Just as good as the CZ and M&P as far as accuracy. For whatever reason, I just really like this model. Spoke to the range officer who recommended this gun to me last week. He said the rental model had the trigger upgrade and all of their models in the retail section were updated as well.
Basically, it was a wash as far as accuracy for the CZ, M&P, and Sig. The Glock was a bit behind those three, but, it was probably due to me not adjusting to the grip. If I was ready to make a purchase right now, it would be the P320.
Last week I shot the G19-5 and didn't like the grip cutout as it stung my pinkie. This week I tried the Gen4 with the finger grooves. Actually had the same issue as I left my pinkie on the crease of the base of the grip. So, I had to adjust again. Of the four, I was the least accurate with the Glock. Maybe it's because I have to adjust my pinkie - on both the 4 and 5, or maybe the grip angle is an issue. I'm sure if I shot it enough, I would adjust to the grip angle. Shot it better than my Shield, but not by a lot as I'm improving with the Shield and saw much greater improvement with my 442 this week.
Next was the CZ75B. Felt good, but of course, heavy. Instantly more accurate than I was with the Glock. Nice pistol. I see why it's known as a good shooter. However, I would probably go with a 75D Compact if I was to purchase a CZ.
M&P9 2.0. I've previously shot the 9C 2.0 and .45 2.0 and they both felt good and were accurate for me. The 9 2.0 was more of the same. Felt good, shot good. On par with the CZ. However, I shot 2 mags and each had one failure to feed properly. That was disappointing, but with a rental gun, who knows. I really like the M&P 2.0's. They feel good, shoot good, and are priced right. I would probably go with the 9C 2.0, but there's not much difference in size between the full size and compact.
I liked the P320 last week so much, I decided to shoot it again. It didn't disappoint as it still feels great to me and was very accurate. Just as good as the CZ and M&P as far as accuracy. For whatever reason, I just really like this model. Spoke to the range officer who recommended this gun to me last week. He said the rental model had the trigger upgrade and all of their models in the retail section were updated as well.
Basically, it was a wash as far as accuracy for the CZ, M&P, and Sig. The Glock was a bit behind those three, but, it was probably due to me not adjusting to the grip. If I was ready to make a purchase right now, it would be the P320.
