Remlin Quality and first impressions...

snowman748

New member
Ok, I recently picked up a Marlin 1895 GBL (in 45/70) online for around $555...after shipping, tax and transfer fee I'm in it $597...

I first want to start this off by saying this is my first lever action "Rifle", I have owned a Rossi Ranchhand lever action "pistol" in the past and have shot a few lever action rifles (mostly 357 Magnum or .22LR) however I have owned many guns and written quite a few gun reviews about them BUT take what I say with a grain of salt because again this is my first lever action to own myself...If I missed something or you have a question about something specific that I didn't cover please feel free to ask and I will answer to the best of my ability.

I was worried about picking up a new Marlin online because of the recent talk about how quality was not the best so instead I looked local. A local gun shop had a 1895 Guide Gun (in 45/70) for $650, it seemed nice enough but I kept looking. Next I found a local Academy had a 1895 (in 45/70) with a 22" barrel for $600 but and first inspection it didn't look or feel very tight or well finished and my gut told me not to buy so I didn't (more later about an Academy purchase I made, buyer beware). I finally found the 1895 GBL on Buds Gunshop.com and took the gamble (I've bought from them in the past with no problems) after a surprisingly short wait I got the gun in the local shop and on first inspection it actually looked very nice so I took it home.

When I got it home I broke down and went over the gun with a fine tooth comb, mounted a scope and replaced the magazine follower; here's what I found starting from barrel to recoil pad...

1.) The barrel crown was good, no dents, dings and looks centered to my naked eye.

2.) The front sight was missing the hood but is centered, square and very easy to pick up with the gold dot. I later found the hood inside the box where it appears to have shipped separate, it went on very easy and *snapped* into place where I wasn't able to simply push it back off.

3.) The barrel and mag tube. Even though the finish isn't up to the "Colt Royal Blue" quality ;) it is still very nice, uniform and a pleasure to look at. It is a gloss finish like all other parts on the gun and matches up well to each other and the rest of the gun.

4.) The front hand guard is laminated wood and to be honest when I bought the gun I just knew I was going to replace it and the stock. However, after actually seeing this rifle in person "IF" I replace the wood I'm not in a hurry to do so. it fits the gun extremely well, has absolutely no movement or play. The finish doesn't leave much to be desired for laminate wood and the checkering adds a nice touch.

5.) The receiver is kinda where I can start to have a complaint be it rather small...first I want to say the finish is very nice, again for what it is and what I paid it leaves little to nothing in my eyes that needs "improving". Parts seem to fit and function together well, no binding or felt grittiness. However, I've found that when I opened the chamber and ran my finger inside, it came out kinda black and almost felt like there was sand inside the gun (note I haven't cleaned this gun AT ALL) this seems a simple fix in that I just need to clean the gun but I thought it something at least worth mentioning.

6.) The bolt and hammer seem well finished enough. I will say the bolt has a polished finish but something about it just screams "this was done by a machine not by hand". don't get me wrong, you can really expect a gun built in the U.S. and hitting the $550 mark to have hand polished and fitted parts also it should be noted that it doesn't look bad. It's really nothing to complain about but on very close inspecting just something about it lacks soul I guess. I will so it is a very smooth finish though. also it should be noted the hammer DOESN'T come with a "offset" spur, for some reason I was under the impression it did but honestly this is a $21 part at Brownells so I'm not hurt or disappointed. I just want to clear up any confusion myself included ;)

7.) the magazine loading process & loading gate/spring seem easy enough, personally it is a bit tight and I have pinched my thumb twice now so I'm probably going to look for a replacement with less tension if I can find it. However this might wear in over time and it should be noted I'm a 6'7" 260lbs man with HUGE hands to match so my experience here is probably not something everyone else will experience but maybe you will.

8.) The rear sight was NOT canted at all and lined up with the front sight post very naturally. It flips down to make room for a scope which is where mine is right now so I have little experience with it.

9.) The trigger and action lever both are very smooth and have zero grit to them. The lever is a little stiff but I know this is something that will wear into place and feel great; I'm very happy that I opted for the large loop. Ok, I'm going to get very nit picky on the trigger (note my AR has a flat face CMC 3.5# trigger and my S&W M&P and a flat face Apex 3# trigger so I'm very picky)...I got to say this trigger definitely needs some work, However it wasn't nearly as bad as I expected. There is some forward play in the trigger where the return spring ends but the triggers movement does not. I didn't feel any creep and the take up is excellent for a stock trigger. The break is very heavy but very clean. My guess would be about 6#-7# stock trigger pull weight but I don't own a trigger gauge to be exact. For most people that's not a big deal at all especially for what this rifle is but personally I'm going to try and reduce it. there also is a slight bit of over travel but this is a lever gun not a semi so it doesn't bother me in the slightest.

10.) The wood to receiver fit are very nice. I'm under no illusion that someone at Marlin hand fitted the stock to the receiver but to be 100% honest it's really damn close. Absolutely no gaps, seams, ect which means it looks and feels nice.

11.) The rear stock is a "pistol grip" style and actually what I prefer, I understand it's not for everyone but I like it very much. again the checkering is a nice touch and the laminate is VERY pretty. I didn't find one blemish I'm very sure happened in the actual laminating process which is pictured below (hopefully, if I can get the pictures to work). personally though I don't mind it at all because I personally believe it adds character BUT I know some people wouldn't care for it.

12.) The recoil pad is an anomaly to me, it's very soft when I use targeted/direct pressure (my thumb) but when I non-targeted/indirect pressure (the palm of my hand) it seems very tough and doesn't have a lot of give. Again I haven't shot the gun so I'm not sure exactly how much it will dampen recoil. I will say it fits my shoulder nicely & the rubber like texture sure does get a hold of you so no worries about it moving on your shoulder when trying to get a sight picture.

13.) Mounting a scope is very simple, I included this because I've seen a lot of guys complaining about the tapped holes in the receiver and mentioning how the stripped or almost stripped the screws that plug those holes. I've also heard someone say they found a loctite like substance on them. This was not my experience at all, instead I found the screws very easy to remove and using the DNZ Products "Game Reaper" one piece mount fit to the receiver like a glove BUT because of my scope choice I had to mount it backwards to give me the ability to get a proper eye relief. This might be something I alone experience because of my great size but wanted to note it.

Note I currently set the gun up with the DNZ Products "Game Reaper" one piece scope mount with 1" rings, topped with a Redfield Revenge 2-7x34 scope and I installed a Brass magazine follower for Beartooth Mercantile and plan to install a saddle ring safety delete. I have the parts and tools to delete the safety but waiting to see how it shoots before I install since that will void the warranty.







 
More Pictures

The picture limit is 6 per comment so I took 6 pictures of the gun, however after trying to post them in the original post the site is telling I was posting 8 pictures and needed to reduce it to 6...so after reducing it to 4 -_- it let me make the most...well here are the other two pictures...

sorry for the poor quality but I took them this morning while it was still dark outside and I was in a hurry to get to work...



 
I really do like the looks of that full mag tube on your rifle. Wish they offered that with the 1895G's.

I bought two Remlins over the past two to three years. One an 1895G, and the other a 336Y (youth).

When I bought the 1895, it was early on, and I didnt know there were problems. Fit and finish on mine were good, and Ive never had an issue with it. All I did, was remove the recoil pad, and fit a butt plate.

Soon after, I did start to hear of problems on the different boards, and did notice some of the same rifles on the shelves had some "AK" type canting on the front sights, and the wood fit was pretty bad.

About a year or so later, I saw a 336Y in a local shop, and hemmed and hawed about getting one. By then, it was pretty well known there were problems, but it sounded like things were getting better. I found one for a decent price in a local shop, and got to pick from three they had on hand. The one on the rack was the best, no canted sights, wood fit was good, action wasnt to bad (Marlins aint Winchesters, good or bad). The other two both had offset/canted rear sights, and the wood wasnt the greatest.

After all that, I didnt get off easy. When I got home, and went to the range, it was obvious they never tested it for function, or if they did, they didnt care. The extractor was never tuned, and the gun locked up on the first round, as the case would not clear the ejection port. Easy enough fix, about 2 seconds in the vise).

Next, the carrier quit picking up rounds from the mag, and I had to get the files out and do some tinkering. Got that squared away, and smoothed out some of the hitchiness in the action while I was at it.

Then the stock came loose at the same time. Seems it was over inleted, and the screw was reefed down extra hard to make up for it. Once I started shooting it, it started to move around. Ended up shimming it.

I thought about sending it back with the carrier issue, but after reading some of the reports of what came back after they went in for repairs, I figured I couldnt do any worse.

The finish on both of mine is pretty crappy, and more of a blue/black "wash" than a bluing. Both dont look bad, but they dont look like my Winchesters either. I did lean my 95G up against the safe getting something else out, and it lightly slid down the edge of the door, putting a weird, "S" shaped scrape on the barrel, which required some cold blue to fix. I dont think a true bluing would have shown the same damage.

It looks like you made out OK with yours, and I wish you good luck with it. The 45-70 are a blast to shoot, and can be a fun, a all day plinker with the right load (I use 14 grains of Trail Boss under a 300 grain hard cast lead bullet).
 
AK I like it well enough, I haven't been able to find a used 45-70 lever gun in my area at all, and only seen 2 new ones (the two I mentioned) the few I've seen online were selling for very high prices when compared to new and if I'm going to buy a gun like that sight unseen I'd rather it be new so at least I have a chance of getting it fixed via warranty (even if customer service is terrible). The only other lever guns I've found in my area all seem to be Winchester 92s in 30-30. Some go for a really decent price were as others seem to go for almost new price.

I'm pretty happy with this one and look forward to shooting it this weekend.
 
the magazine loading process & loading gate/spring seem easy enough,
personally it is a bit tight and I have pinched my thumb ...
You may already know this, but...

1. Don't load all cartridges completely as they go in. Leave the last 1/4"and
rim still exposed and use the next cartridge to push the gate down and the
leading cartridge the rest of the way... leaving the next cartridge "hanging
out" again...

2zqvfjn.jpg


2. On last cartridge, turn your thumb sideways (so the nail is 90 degr to the side
plate) to push the gate down and the round fully home. That way the gate
edges ride your hard thumbnail :D and not your thumb pad :eek:.

.
 
Last edited:
Every time I read a thread like this I feel ill. I do so miss Marlin. I have enough but what a shame for the future. And to whomever, this is not normal quality for built to price $500 gun, it is poor. Marlin's were a great value back in the day.
 
I'll make sure to give an after action report but probably wont come till Monday as I won't get a chance to hit the gun range till this weekend.

I did some dry runs last night with some 405 grain bullets that I picked up and seemed to function flawlessly.

btw the whole turning my thumb sideways helped a lot for keeping the gate from smashing my thumb so thanks mehavey.
 
Marlins were great "working" guns-very traditional look, though they did build higher grades. My first deer rifle was a 336 in "fancy" grade, about 50 years ago. Belonged to my uncle-simply beautiful gun, .35 Remington, with peep sights. Love it, but when he passed, it went to another nephew of his and I got a double barrel shotgun that I never saw before!

Only Marlin I have is my Model 39A, bought about 30 years ago. Just feels like the guns cowboys carried a century ago. Would love to see the same feel from Marlin again, but, I think the only way to get it, is to find good used Marlins.
 
Range Report

Ok, I know this thread is kinda dying but a few guys asked me to put a range report about the Marlin and I didn't feel it was right to start a new thread for it...

Ok first I want to qualify my observations with a few things. First, I normally don't shoot off of a rest but off hand instead & the "rest" we used was a ammo can with a folded blanket laid on top (my buddy forgot his rifle rest). Second, this was the last rifle I sighted in for the day out of 4 so fatigue might have started to set in. Third, I was on a limited time frame so I didn't get any pictures because I was rushing to get everything I could sighted in (didn't have time to sight in a 17 HMR). Fourth, I have done nothing to this rifle, no break in period, I didn't even take it apart to lube or clean it, essentially I pulled it out of the box and shot it. Lastly, I only shot at 25 & 50 yards because the range we were at was hosting a long range comp.

I shot 20 rounds out of the rifle and my buddy shot 4 (just to experience it). I will say the ammo we shot was some was some very lightly loaded and was anything but punishing like you hear out of most people on forums. granted it was factory loads and I will be reloading it significantly hotter I thought it worth saying factory PPU 30-06 (the rifle we sighted before this one) has a lot sharper felt recoil.

The Accuracy:

After several shots trying to get on paper (it shot VERY low) I finally got it adjusted enough to were I had about a 1" group with 3 shots at 25 yards which I personally felt comfortable with all things considered and bumped out to 50 yards. Again it grouped low but continued to group about 1-1.25" groups. I finally got it hitting the center and felt good about it. Handed it to my buddy (who has more experience with heavy triggers and is honestly a better shot) and his first shot was a flyer that he called (didn't expect the heavy trigger and light recoil). His next 3 shots were all touching almost forming an upside down triangle in about a 1/2" group. You can't ask for better accuracy then that out of a lever gun with factory ammo.

The Reliability:

Ok, I tried three different positions for working the action and three different speeds just to see what I would get out of the rifle. Those positions were, rifle sideways ejection port straight in the air, rifle in normal shooting position, and rifle sideways ejection port down...the range wouldn't let me try it upside down (and honestly what merit is there to that?)...the speeds were very slowly and controlled, about what I would consider normal speed for a lever gun, lastly a quick as I could work the rifle. The rifle functioned as well as could be expected in my opinion. With the rifle ejection port straight in the air the rifle extracted the round every time but failed to eject it when worked very slowly and at normal speed but did eject when the action was worked very quickly. In the normal shooting position it extracted every time and ejected every time no problem. and obviously with the ejection port down it extracted and ejected every time no problem. The Rifle loaded every round everytime from every position without a single problem.

The Action:

So I've never experienced any kind of grittiness out of the box like most complain about however I did experience a stiff lever and heavy trigger. after shooting there still doesn't seem to be any grittiness but the lever did loosen up a bit and is a lot more comfortable & easier to use. The Trigger didn't get any lighter or crisper so I do plan to replace it with a "Trigger-Happy Kit" from Wild West Guns whenever I get a chance.

My Conclusion:

All around I'm very happy with my purchase, there are definitely some places that Marlin (Remington) could improve but with all things considered for the price I paid $597 after tax, shipping & FFL fee I feel very good about my purchase. I also feel like when compared to the other companies building lever actions right now (like Rossi, Winchester, Browning & Henry) Marlin still has a place and hopefully can continue to improve and become a great name in rifle building again.

I'm also willing to answer any questions you might have and hope this helps someone in making a decision about either buying or not buying a Marlin.
 
Will it take away the standard Marlin "hitchy-ness" in the levers action?

I never had any complaints about the triggers, its the action I find annoying. That safety/firing pin (for lack of a better description) notch towards the rear of the bolt, that catches the hammer as you work the lever, seems to be the biggest culprit there. I was able to smooth it out some, but Im scared to go much farther.
 
hitchy-ness

I know what you mean about "hitchy-ness" AK but honestly it doesn't seem to be to bad on my example at least, it seemed worse on the Rossi Ranchhand (in 357 magnum) I had back in the day and about the same as the 2 Winchester 92s (both in 30-30) I tried in a local pawn shop...my dad's VERY old Rossi in 357 is smoother but I'm not sure if that's a product of the older guns being more "built by hand" rather then "built by machine" or if it's just been shot and worked over so much it's smoother. Like I mentioned there is definitely room for improvement but the only other lever guns that seem to be had for the same price as the Marlins are the Rossi's and Henry's (maybe Mossberg but I have no info about them) and yes the Henry's might have a better fit and finish but the lack of a loading gate really kills it in my opinion...

also I did have a moment of disappointment at the range (at least at first)...

When I turned the rifle over to my buddy to shoot I worked the lever, put the rifle on safe and left it pointing down range...he got on the rifle, took aim, hammer dropped and "click"...no shot..."hard primer?" so I had him eject the spent shell but there wasn't even a primer hit. "Oh No, I put 20 rounds down it and the damn thing breaks!"...I looked over and the safety was still engaged, relief rushed over me, I pointed at the safety and he replied "oh the safety doesn't lock out the trigger?"

lol, so for the record the "safety" is just as it's called "a hammer block" and doesn't lock out the trigger, this is something I already knew but wanted to say just in cause others didn't know that...
 
I know what you mean about "hitchy-ness" AK but honestly it doesn't seem to be to bad on my example at least
Thats good.

I was never really a Marlin guy (not that I dont now like the ones Ive got), and the ones I have, or have shot, all seemed "rough" in the action, compared to the Winchesters I have.

lol, so for the record the "safety" is just as it's called "a hammer block" and doesn't lock out the trigger, this is something I already knew but wanted to say just in cause others didn't know that...
Saw that coming. :)

I dont use mine, but even so, its probably a good habit to get into to check it each time you intend to use it.
 
Back
Top