Remind me.....
- Thread starter Trapp
- Start date
Lord_Nikon
New member
It's great seeing all of the Bush voters who are resorting to the "Kerry would have been worse" line. It may be true, it may not. But why can't people come out and say it?
"They both suck!"
"They both suck!"
steelheart
Moderator
It seems that Bush is good for gun rights, BAD for illegal immigration reform.
Refusing to secure our southern border is the one big axe I have to grind with him.
Oh, and that damn Dubai/UAE ports deal HAS GOT TO GO...:barf: :barf:
Refusing to secure our southern border is the one big axe I have to grind with him.
Oh, and that damn Dubai/UAE ports deal HAS GOT TO GO...:barf: :barf:
Curly Jones
Inactive
They have to make too many deals just to get elected. Their agenda is bought and paid for by the time they ascend to office.
If you bribe a police officer or a judge they will throw you in jail. If you bribe a lawmaker they call you a lobbyist and give you a seven figure salary.
Until we throw the money changers out of the temple our democracy will continue to decline.
Excuse the rant....this one gets to me.
If you bribe a police officer or a judge they will throw you in jail. If you bribe a lawmaker they call you a lobbyist and give you a seven figure salary.
Until we throw the money changers out of the temple our democracy will continue to decline.
Excuse the rant....this one gets to me.
cosmolinelover
New member
Badnarik would have been a better choice. Thats it.
During the last election it occured to me that the nomination of John Kerry must have been as disappointing to the Democrats as the nomination of that feeb Bob Dole was in 1996 for the Republicans. I'm from Kansas but it was apparent to me Dole was too old and slow to beat BC.
It was that guy who consistently supports more restrictive gun control laws, and who voted against legislation that prohibits frivolous lawsuits against gun manufacturers. Wait a minute, maybe I'm wrong -- I think that he actually voted pro-Second Amendment before he voted against it....
Mike Irwin
Staff
"It's great seeing all of the Bush voters who are resorting to the "Kerry would have been worse" line. It may be true, it may not. But why can't people come out and say it?"
I don't have to say it. As far as I'm concerned, Kerry, or ANY individual running on the Democratic platform, would be worse than Bush.
I'd vote for a maggot infested, impossible-to-identify road kill baking in the South Georgia sun before I voted voted for presidential candidate running under the Democratic banner.
Why?
Because I have absolutely no interest in participating in the Democrats visions for equal distribution of wealth (aka highway robbery), political correctness (aka we can be as hateful as we want when we're talking about you, but you can't say anything at all), sensible gun laws (aka, if you own a gun, you'll be jailed), crime control (aka, oh you poor underpriviledged man, have some free money and don't worry about those two robberies/murders)...
Yeah, I know, the way things are going the Republicans aren't much better.
But that still provides more than ample comfort room.
I don't have to say it. As far as I'm concerned, Kerry, or ANY individual running on the Democratic platform, would be worse than Bush.
I'd vote for a maggot infested, impossible-to-identify road kill baking in the South Georgia sun before I voted voted for presidential candidate running under the Democratic banner.
Why?
Because I have absolutely no interest in participating in the Democrats visions for equal distribution of wealth (aka highway robbery), political correctness (aka we can be as hateful as we want when we're talking about you, but you can't say anything at all), sensible gun laws (aka, if you own a gun, you'll be jailed), crime control (aka, oh you poor underpriviledged man, have some free money and don't worry about those two robberies/murders)...
Yeah, I know, the way things are going the Republicans aren't much better.
But that still provides more than ample comfort room.
JohnBrowning
New member
I met Mike Badnairik. He would indeed have been a better choice.
I suppose the question is why didn't he pull more votes. Lack of name recognition? Lack of ideas, publicity or a solid party platform? I'm sure there are many hardworking intelligent people out there who could run this country as well as some of our elected officials, but being able to do it and having the resources at hand to get elected are two entirely different things.
I had forgotten that Ralph Nader managed to finish third.
"Badnarik polled just under 400,000 popular votes nationwide, in the November 2, 2004 election, taking 0.34% of the popular vote and placing fourth, just behind Ralph Nader."
I had forgotten that Ralph Nader managed to finish third.
"Badnarik polled just under 400,000 popular votes nationwide, in the November 2, 2004 election, taking 0.34% of the popular vote and placing fourth, just behind Ralph Nader."
My personal opinion is it really doesn't matter who you vote into office. It's our system that's corrupt and needs change.
When did our public servants become the powerful and We the People become subjects that do as we're told?
In my opinion , that's what it's come down to.
Doesn't matter whose president. Our countries bureaucracy has become so convoluted and bloated nothing gets done like it should anymore and the real powers in this coutry hide behind the politics and politicians who just serve as mouth pieces and pacifiers.
When did our public servants become the powerful and We the People become subjects that do as we're told?
In my opinion , that's what it's come down to.
Doesn't matter whose president. Our countries bureaucracy has become so convoluted and bloated nothing gets done like it should anymore and the real powers in this coutry hide behind the politics and politicians who just serve as mouth pieces and pacifiers.