Rem 700 .308 carbine build

steveNChunter

New member
Finally got my rifle back from the gunsmith, I thought I'd start a thread on it to sorta show it off. This is a first for me as I've never done a "build" before.

The idea for the rifle was hatched from me thinking of every feature I wanted in an ideal short, handy, rugged rifle for woods/brush hunting, and noticing that there wasn't really anything on the market that fit the bill entirely.

My feature list consisted of:

-chambered in .308

-16.5" sporter profile stainless barrel

-laminate stock

-hinged floorplate magazine (never understood a bolt action hunting rifle with detachable mags)

The only factory rifle I knew of that had all of these features was the Ruger M77 Hawkeye Laminate Compact.

I considered buying one but I also had preferences of a lefty thumbhole stock, Cerakote finish, and a threaded barrel in case I wanted to try out a muzzle brake or eventually maybe a suppressor.

I could have bought the Ruger and done all of those things to it, but I decided instead to use something I already had, while putting a rough budget on the build of $800, roughly the new price of the Ruger.

I had a Remington 700 BDL in .243 made in '71, with an older Tasco scope. I had recently aquired it in a trade and had about $350 invested in it but I sold the Tasco scope that came on it for $50 and the factory barrel for another $50 so that put me at $250 for the action.

I found a new take-off Rem 700 .308 stainless barrel on Ebay for $150 and free shipping, and bought a Boyd's pepper lam. lefty thumbhole stock with a shortened length of pull and recoil pad, for $150. Then it was off to the gunsmith. I had him rebarrel it, shorten the new barrel to 16.25", thread the muzzle 5/8x24, Cerakote the whole barreled action graphite black, and thread the bolt and put on a stainless knob. My bill with him was $350. So that put my total at $900, $100 over my goal but it's all good because I ended up with exactly what I wanted. And that's worth the extra hundred to me. I already had a Burris FFII 3-9x40 laying around to put on it, so I just ordered a DNZ one piece scope mount to put it together. Here's the finished product:

10384904_777191355647591_8072817327958555391_n.jpg


Now all that's left is to get a good load worked up for it. That's always fun:D
 
A 700 in 308 would be my choice. How is the trigger? That stock sure is a beauty. The gray lam has a rustic look yet it shines. Sure is a short tube. Just a little shorter than I like but it isn't mine anyway. Are You going to put a leather sling on it? If that gun were mine I couldn't see leaving it behind. I hope you can get it to shoot tight. Do you have a bullet picked out? Good luck!
 
Very nice... I have a .308 bolt action in my near future as well, & I'm partial to the BDL format...

Me too. I like the hinged floorplate for hunting. Never cared for blind mags and the DBM's are too easy to lose and better left to semi-autos IMO.

How is the trigger?...Sure is a short tube...Are You going to put a leather sling on it?...Do you have a bullet picked out?

I left the factory trigger in it for now because it breaks clean as glass a just under 3 pounds and has almost no overtravel. That's perfect for hunting IMO. People can say what they want about the older Rem 700 triggers as far as safety concerns, but I've never seen one malfunction that was clean and not adjusted too light.

I went with the 16.25" sporter barrel because I do alot of woods hunting, usually alot of walking, and the vast majority of my shots are under 150 yards. With this barrel I anticipate being about 200 fps under most published data velocities. That still puts me easily ahead of the good ole .30-30. When you are hunting close range, I have learned the hard way that more velocity usually just means more mess. If I go on a hunt that I'll have a farther shot, I have several longer barreled rifles in flatter shooting chamberings to use. But honestly I wouldn't feel under-gunned with this setup on any hunt I've ever been on, or for that matter 95% of the hunting that takes place in the lower 48.

I have several slings, I just don't stick them on till I'm ready to go hunting.

As for a bullet, the gun will have to decide that in the end, but I am hoping it likes the 150 gr Sierra Pro-Hunter. I bought a box to try. I am about to do some ladder testing later today with RL-15, CCI 200 primers, and Lapua brass.
 
Very nice looking rifle, you did a great job. How much does it weigh?

Good luck on your testing today, hope you get lucky and hit a winner first try. Let us know how it goes.
 
@sNC: Thank you for sharing your experience and posting the picture. The finished product is very nice.

I've been thinking about doing something similar with a savage model 11, hog hunter chambered for .308 by just adding a boyd's stock, oversized bolt handle, steel trigger guard, and installing a detachable leupold 1-4X. Of course the hog hunter would be heavier and have a 20 inch barrel intead of a 16.5 inch one.

Just curious about a minor detail: It took a couple of glances at the picture before it sunk in that it was a right hand action in a left hand stock. Isn't there a bolt handle relief/cutout on the left side of the stock? Did you fill it somehow or leave it? Or can you order a boyd's stock without the bolt handle relief?
 
@hammie- You can order a left-hand thumbhole right-hand action from Boyd's with no extra bolt relief. Which is nice for me being a lefty that owns all right-handed rifles. I was brought up shooting that way and I prefer the bolt on the right side. That makes most thumbhole stocks a "no-go" for me though. It's really nice that Boyd's gives you that option.

http://www.boydsgunstocks.com/product.htm?pid=8401&cat=1219

@AllenJ- In it's current state with the scope it weighs a tad over 7.5 pounds according to picking it up by my trigger pull gauge. Not a featherweight but it's short length still makes it very handy to carry. I could have saved weight by going with a synthetic or even walnut stock vs. the laminate, but I like the looks vs. a synthetic and the insensitivity to climate/moisture vs. a walnut.
 
Last edited:
@sNC: It's good to know about that gun stock option. I just restocked two rifles with boyd's laminates and I think their stocks are an amazing value. I trust your new rifle will shoot as good as it looks.
 
You can order a left-hand thumbhole right-hand action from Boyd's with no extra bolt relief.

I'm right handed and often considered buying a left hand bolt action. Although unorthodox, seems to me I would like that configuration while shooting. You'll have to let us know if your opinion on it changes after some use.
 
Is the Boyd's stock requiring bedding...

The barreled action sits in the stock surprisingly tight, and is free floated with an even gap on both sides of the barrel channel. I only shot 5 rounds through it to zero the scope yesterday before I got rained out, so I don't yet know how accurate it is. If I can work up a sub-MOA load for it, I probably won't bother bedding it.

Whose barrel did you put on it?

It's a new take-off Remington stainless barrel I got off Ebay for $150. The guy I bought it off of buys new stainless SPS's to build on the action and sells the stocks and barrels. I'm optimistic that it will shoot better than a factory barrel since it has been recrowned and headspaced by a gunsmith taking his time instead of a quick factory job.

I'm also going to be doing some testing with this rifle using Hodgdon LeverEvolution powder, which there is no data for in .308 win. I have talked to a member of this forum who has done load workup with this powder in .300 savage (also with no data to go by). I will be using his data as a rough starting point for my testing. I'll have a thread on it over in the reloading forum when I post results.
 
It's shaping up as a nice hunting rifle, Steve.
The thumbhole stock surprises me, though.
Don't you find them somewhat slower handling?

You may be lowering the scope to get rid of that brushgrabber gap at the front.

Love the bbl length & I also shoot lefty crossbolt.
 
The thumbhole stock surprises me, though.
Don't you find them somewhat slower handling?


Actually I think they handle better for me personally. I can carry the rifle with my thumb in the hole, right where my hand needs to be to pull the trigger. I also find them easier to hold when shooting unsupported. It's just a preference thing I guess.

I got to do a bit of load testing today, and I tried out the LeverEvolution powder. I accidentely shot a rod on my chrony the other day so I can't test velocity yet, but the accuracy wasn't stellar so I'm not too worried about it. I got up to 45 grains with it, getting about 1.5 MOA. Groups may tighten up if I push it a little higher but I'd rather not yet seeing as how I don't know my velocity nor do I have any published data to go by.

I found good accuracy with Varget. I worked up to 46.0 grains so far which is about a grain below max in my manual. I may go a little higher with the charge weight just to see what happens. I also still need to play around with seating depth and try a couple different primers, but I've already surpassed my goal of sub-MOA so overall I'm happy with it. After all, it's just a hunting rifle, not a target rifle.

10366225_778194078880652_5107669791269552569_n.jpg
 
Back
Top