Recoil Reducing guide rod system

I haven't used any of Sprinco's recoil reducers, but Alan Dugger (the owner) is the guy I use to transfer my firearms. They make all of their recoil reducers by hand, and, from what I've seen, the parts are top class.

Also really good folks to do business with.
 
Used their product in a Glock 17, Glock 19. Worked great!
Do not use with a Buffer Technologies buffer though. Think the Springco is rated for 10,000 rds.
 
I have a Sprinco recoil reducer for my Sig 220 and my Walther P99 .40S&W. The quality of these two units is top notch and Alan is great to work with.

With that said, I really like the reducer for the P220 and it has been in my gun since the day I bought it. As for the P99 reducer, I expected a little more. The recoil reduction was O.K. but the stiff spring made racking the slide very difficult. I still use it when I'm shooting stout loads, but that's about it.

-Red-
 
Recoil?

About two months ago I installed a Sprinco in my SigPro 2340. The difference was slight but noticeable. After two months and hundreds of rounds, the difference is still there.

I noticed the biggest difference when I put my SigPro down and picked up my brothers identical (non sprinco) piece. My groups were larger and follow up shots took longer.

These recoil reducing guide rods are not magic, nor are they gimmiks. They have value in some weapons, for some people.

Buy accordingly.
-LeadPumper
 
I have a sprinco in my SIG P220. I love it. Faster follow-up shots and a noticeable reduction in muzzle flip. Cheapest upgrade ever.
 
I have one in my Taurus PT-99 and it makes a difference with higher powered loads. The light stuff won't cycle the action completely and even some of the medium loads I use won't lock the slide back. I like it enough that I'm planning on buying one for my Taurus PT-945 not that one's available.
 
so heres a question for anyone who might know - which is more effective, the Hartt's recoil reducer or the Sprinco?
 
Harrts vs. Sprinco -
It is an apple and oranges comparison. The only way to actually reduce recoil is to decrease the bullet weight, decrease the velocity, decrease the caliber, increase the weight of the gun, or add a compensator that works.

Harrts is designed to reduce muzzle flip. I am still not sure that a heavier guide rod that weighs the same or more than a Harrts would have the same effect. It does reduce muzzle flip somewhat and tends to work better in full size guns of larger calibers. In other words it works better in a 1911 in .45 ACP than a SIG P229 in 9mm. The Harrts has no effect on a compensated pistol as the comp is doing the work.

Sprinco does not add weight to reduce muzzle flip. It gives the perception of reducing recoil by spreading the recoil impulse out over a longer period of time. It does this by slowing the slide down a fraction of an inch sooner so that when the recoiling slide impacts the frame it is going much slower, hence the perception that recoil has been reduced. One of the most noticable of these is in the Glock 30, the Sprinco takes all of the 'snap' out of the recoil. As other have said, Sprinco works best with full power loads. If you limp wrist the gun or shoot weak handloads the gun may not lock open on an empty mag and may have failures to feed. If you go with a Sprinco I have found that they need break in just like an auto pistol. I tend to lock the slide open for a couple of weeks before I ever go out to test fire the pistol. They do work with compensators and many of the nationally ranked Bianchi Cup and IPSC competitors swear by them. I have nearly 20 is various pistols. As another shooter mentioned, I just tried one in my Walther P99 .40 cal and there was little difference. This could be due to the design of the Walther having a low bore axis, but I also noticed that the Beretta/Taurus guns do not seem to benefit as much in my experience.

I can only suggest that you try it out in your gun with you shooting it. Alan is great about letting you try out the reducer. Buy it. If you try it and don't like it, send it back in 30 days for a full refund. The best way to test is to have two identical guns shooting the same ammo side by side and be sure to hold tight to let the reducer do the work.
 
I had a sprinco in my Glock 36, not much perceptible difference, so I took em up on their money back guarntee. Great Company, and I think I am going to try them again with my usp compact 9 as it has a different recoil assembly and I think it may make an improvement. Anyone have experience with this on a usp compact? Thanks.
 
Back
Top