The .45 search continues...it was raining again so I went and rented more .45 autos. I started with a S&W 4506, a full sized duty-type pistol. I shot all these guns at 15 yds today, the lights were dim at the longer distance line. I probably could have turned them brighter (there are controls on the wall behind us) but I just shot standing off-hand, two-handed at 15yds instead.
I had a very difficult time getting a good sight picture with this gun, but it was mostly because the front white dot was full of dirt, so it was a kind of grey. Along with the rounded rear sight edges I had a difficult time getting a crisp post-in-notch sight picture. And the magazine was as hard to fill with eight as the Glock mag was to get ten into! My poor thumbs! I'm sure the nice old gun was more accurate than I shot it.
Next I tried a SIG 220. The magazine was easy to fill with eight .45 cartridges! What were they thinking? :-O I'm sold already!! And it's smaller than the S&W 4506 and the Springfield 1911 that I try next, which both also hold eight cartridges. Sure the Glock 21 is larger but it can hold 13 in normal places, and ten (if you have thumbs of steel) even in CA. I like the sights on the 220 and once I got used to how it worked it was _very_ accurate! I shot all of these single-action, having loaded the magazine with the slide back and chambered the first round by releasing the slide.
Lastly, before all my fingers went numb from loading these damn magazines, I shot a Springfield 1911. It wasn't a Target or Loaded model, just a Mil-Spec "improved" 1911. The damn magazine wasn't too hard to fill compared to the 4506, but it still wasn't as easy as the SIG 220's had been. The sights weren't quite as good as the SIG's but not as bad as the 4506's either. The trigger had a fair amount of slack but once you got used to were it went off, you could take the slack up quickly and predictably. I think this nice gun was also more accurate than I shot it, but I don't think it or the S&W was as accurate as the SIG 220.
Hmm, do I like the SIG 220 or the Glock 21 better? Eight rounds of .45 isn't bad, although 10- 13 isn't bad either. I really liked the shape of the 220 when I was shooting it, but I liked holding onto the 21 a lot too. Believe it or not I liked the short double-action Glock 21 trigger as much as any of the single-action triggers, but I liked the SIG 220 trigger as much as the Glock 21's.
But I still haven't shot any of the Para-Ord LDA pistols yet! And I missed a Target model Springfield 1911 that someone else had out on rental and I think there's a S&W 1911 in the rental group too! So I shouldn't try to decide yet, right? Or maybe I should just get the new $600 Glock 21 _and_ the used $650 SIG 220 they have at Markley's and shoot them while I'm "deciding"!?! Yeah, that's the ticket, yeah...
- Thomas