Questions about Kahr pistols

F

Futo Inu

New member
Since I need some cash, I was thinking of maybe selling my Glock 27. But then when I replace it after I square away my finances, I was thinking of switching to an even smaller pistol to fill its niche, and the 9mm polymer Kahr appeals to me, for a couple of reasons. First, it should be small enough to carry as a pocket pistol, I think, and about as light or lighter as the G27. Second, I'm thinking of getting another 9mm pistol in the near future (G34), so simplifying the number of calibers I own is appealing - eliminating .40 s&w from the mix, and sticking with 9mm, .45 acp/sup, and 10mm. Nothing wrong with .40, just trying to streamline a bit - plus 9mm is cheaper.

So,

1. Are the polymer Kahrs out yet?
2. What the the smallest & lightest 9mm Kahr - which model?
3. What's the cost?
4. What are the pros and cons of the Kahr? Anyone with actual experience with the polymer Kahr?

Thank you.
 
<OL TYPE=1>
<LI> The polymer Kahrs are out -- I saw one at a local gunshop about a week ago.
<LI> The smallest Kahr is the MK9 -- slightly smaller than a PPK and over half a inch smaller (in height and length) than the polymer Kahr. Despite it's smaller size, an empty MK9 is almost half a pound heavier than an empty polymer one. So, tha smallest is not the lightest and the lightest is not the smallest.
<LI> Don't remember what the dealer had it listed for.
<LI> What some people look at as con's others will see as pro's. I particularily don't like DAO pistols. Yet because of it's micro size, the MK9 is my everyday carry weapons except when it gets cold (which rarely happens in the swamps of southern Florida), then I switch to a 4013TSW. That said, the DAO pull is one of the smoothest around and after I changed the recoil spring (the early Kahrs had problems in this area), the gun has functioned flawlessly. While there is a kick to it, the all-steel construction makes shooting even hot loads controlable. I never shot the polymer one so I can't say anything about it, but I would not hesitate recommending the MK9 for DEEP concelment such as during the summer months or if you live in a part of the country (like I do) where it's hot almost all year long.
</OL>

------------------
Share what you know, learn what you don't -- FUD.
 
Futo: I have the K40 & E9. I WILL have the P9. Can't say enough about them. For me, they're of a size that makes them "always" guns. I plan on trying out the P in an ankle carry role, possibly to replace my J-frame.

I don't know about the MK's, as they seem to be the only ones on this board with the occasional glitch. I find that the trigger is much more friendly then the Glock's I've had/shot, no handicap at all. Accuracy in the 9 is top-shelf. In the 40, well, it IS a 40 after all.:O It still holds under 3" @ 25yds. if I do my part. Go for it! :)
 
Well, if you need cash, there's nothing wrong with making 9 mm your defense caliber. The ammo's cheaper, amen to that. You'll just have to aim more precise, that's all :).

MK9 is a fantastic gun. Simply make sure it's not one of the earliest production pistol, and you'll be very pleased with its smoothness and high reliability. My first personal choice for CCW is MK40 -- each trigger pull gives you a very pleasant feeling of highly oiled glide. Nice...

If Kahr attempted to make this little thing (MK40) lighter, recoil would be unbearable. I'm, however, convinced something definitely could be done with MK9.
 
The MK9 is a great little gun, about the same weight as a G27 when loaded, but much thinner. The MK9 holds fewer rounds, but it's much easier to carry a spare mag. I had my holster guy make me a little leather sheath for the mag that I can carry in my pocket without the big bulge that a Glock mag would cause. In addition, the Kahr is also comfortable and fun to shoot, unlike many of the smaller guns.

The downside is the price. I paid $599 for mine (with factory Trijicons) last summer. Also, all of the Kahrs released so far have had problems with the early models. They quickly straightened them out, but with the cost of shipping a gun these days, I would avoid buying one of the first P9s off the line.


[This message has been edited by craigz (edited February 25, 2000).]
 
Like FUD, I'm not overly fond of DAO's, but find MK9 elite 98 to be very smooth pull. Mine is with me all the time because it's completely concealable and 100% reliable.
 
Thanks CraigZ, I feel better about paying $599 for my MK40 with the night sights now. Did you reply when I asked about the price a few days ago???

My Kahr is evidently one of the first ten or so off the assembly line. As soon as I dissconect from the net, I'm going to call Kahr about replacing the recoils spring.

I don't know about the 9's, but if I get the few minors buggs worked outta my Kahr, I will be totally in love with this little gun. Mine is heavy, but I like the fact that it is all steel, and because of the size and design, if needed I will spend extra money to get this gun tuned the way that I want it to sing.

But on the more economical note; What about Kel-tech? I don't know anbything about Kel-tech except they make small guns, and one of the price lists that I saw, they were significantly less in price than the Kahr's. But I dunno about that, just thought I would throw ought more fodder for thought.

DaHaMac
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top