chadstrickland
New member
I ordered me two of them from nodakspud which are excellent and I am in the process of two builds. However they claim that heat treating there receivers are a critical step in making the rifle last. I understand that heat treating certain metals will strengthen it as long as it is done properly. You can weaken the metal if done improperly.
My question is this....has anyone here ever heat treated something successfully? And if so how did you do it.
Another question. How much does it really help? Is the metal under enough stress where the heat treatment is needed?
I know that the true ak47 rifle had a milled receiver which would be stronger than the stamped receiver and that what I have is a akm with a stamped receiver. My personal conclusion is that they switched over because of 3 reasons 1 less weight 2 cheaper and easier to mass produce 3 pretty much a mixture of the other two..the stamped receiver could handle the stress and was lighter, cheaper and easier to make.
Just leads me back to my original question. Can a receiver with no heat treating hold up?
My question is this....has anyone here ever heat treated something successfully? And if so how did you do it.
Another question. How much does it really help? Is the metal under enough stress where the heat treatment is needed?
I know that the true ak47 rifle had a milled receiver which would be stronger than the stamped receiver and that what I have is a akm with a stamped receiver. My personal conclusion is that they switched over because of 3 reasons 1 less weight 2 cheaper and easier to mass produce 3 pretty much a mixture of the other two..the stamped receiver could handle the stress and was lighter, cheaper and easier to make.
Just leads me back to my original question. Can a receiver with no heat treating hold up?
Last edited: