Quality of my Rifling (Mosin)

SigP6Carry

New member
I've got a 42 M91/30. I love it. It shoots pretty well. But, I finally got around taking pictures of my rifling and found that I could decipher how well it looked.

Would ya'll mind helping me out a little?
DSC01117.jpg

DSC01127.jpg


See, to me: it's always looked clean and bright. But, I'm starting to think I may not have been the best judge of it. The crown looks a little on the weak side, too.

edit: note that it isn't rusted and pitted like the picture makes it look. The bore is actually very clean, the camera (a crappy Sony) makes things look crappy at close range, combine that with a 2D maglite and it makes things look rather brown.
 
Last edited:
Looks like good strong rifiling to me.
Just remember to clean it well after shooting corrosive ammo.
Very nice pictures by the way.
 
I actually don't shoot corrosive ammo through it, for fear of eating away the rifling. I fire Wolf and Brown Bear threw it. (is that the right "threw?") to ensure the longevity of my barrel and accuracy. With Wolf, I get about 1.5MOA. Brown Bear, I've never really measured. But When I really started looking into Mosin's and their issues, I started thinking I might have jumped the gun on my gun's accuracy rating and maybe it was less of a quality weapon than I thought.

Edit, also, the math adds up about right for me: $11-12 per 20 = $.55-60 per round vs. $44 per round for surplus ammo. I'll pay an extra ten cents per round to promote the longevity of my rifle's life, plus guaranteeing the quality of my ammo.
 
Last edited:
if you really want longevity out of your pet gun, look into reloading led bullets, especially if you have some guns (like your mosin) you enjoy shooting alot.

I myself thought it was silly to load lead, but it really grew on me and I doubt I'l wear out a barrel in my lifetime if I use suitable powders.

You seem to care about quality ammo that isn't high priced (as anyone would), and this points to handloading ammo. Surplus ammo in that caliber wont be around forever, in fact I remember when 303 british was as common as hens teeth as well.
 
Thomme, you really don't have to worry about shooting corrosive ammo. As long as you clean within a couple of days after firing you will be fine. I will say that it may be worth it for you to pay an extra 10 cents per round to not have to worry about cleaning EVERY time... and hey, I can't say as I blame you. I'm a tightwad, you may not be.

Your rifling is pitted and the rifle will never be worth more than the value of the lumber that comprises the stock. As a matter of fact, it looks as if this would be a potential danger to shoot. Were you willing to send it to me, I would be willing to dispose of this pitted and rusted firearm, that is obviously useless and a potential hazard, for free for you. I'll even pay shipping
:D:p









JK in the bold, it looks pretty darn good for a Mosin. They're good rifles, but a crap shoot on the bore. Looks like you have a fairly decent one.
 
I looked into it. And Shipping alone is $200. Plus my own finder's fee of $50. So, if you want this particular piece of crap, go ahead.

But, yeah, like I've said. It "seems" to shoot 1.5 MOA with Wolf (the honest truth is: out of 10 shots, the closest five were within 1.5" of each other with the epicenter a couple centimeters {I must digress on centimeters, the "center" was truly a few inches, not centimeters. I'm'a bad judge of distance [I once thought a 12" pizza would feed 4 people]} to the lower right of the bullseye [this was freehand... I'll try it out benched soon]) Brown bear, I never checked how close the shots really were. I don't know what the weight of the bullet has on it, cause of that. I've considered spending the next couple years converting it into a PU, but I'm not 100% confident in the rifle itself. I don't want to convert a "minute of a pie-plate [a phrase I've heard regarding these]" rifle into a $400 piece of crap that looks cool cause of the "Enemy at the Gates."

I've always thought the bore looked bright, clean, crisp and nice. But I'm new to the who judgement of weapons type thing... and am not 100% I'm a good judge.
 
Last edited:
The first Mosin I bought was a M44. Looked great on the outside, but when I cleaned it, brushed and swabbed out the bore, looking through the barrel was like looking down a gravel road!. The rifling was still strong, just very pitted.
It still shot great, and I still have it.
 
I just bought my first Mossin today, I actually bought it for my Son, from a private collector.
Ours has the Octogon reciever and is dated 1933.
The rifleing looks as good as the one pictured here.
We dont have any amunition for it yet, but cant wait to try it.
 
I just picked up a Tula hex 91/30(1932) myself. This one is for me since my son claimed the M44 I bought. My 91/30 rifleing looks great, I couldn't have asked for a better bore. It actually has a really nice shine to it. Almost mirror like. Not as good as my new hunting rifles but still very very nice. Shoots great too. I'm going to go shoot it at 100 meter's this weekend to see how well I can do with it. It prolly out shoot me since I can't all that great.:mad:
 
Looks like very good rifling. These rifles have shot corrosive ammo through them since they were made over 60 years ago. Just clean them properly and they will continue to shoot relatively accurately for years to come. I have put thousands of rounds of corrosive ammo through mine without any loss of accuracy.
 
I agree with the majority of you guys, there is way too much emphasis put on shiney bright bores. I have a 6.5 Arisaka I re-cut to 6.5x55 and the barrel was so bad when I got it that I could not get a cleaning patch through without ripping. I put a steel brush on a cleaning rod, soaked it with bore cleaner, and used an electric drill on it until I could run a patch through decently. It may have been salt water and ammo rust. It still doesn't look great up the bore, but it is the best 6.5 I have @100 yards. After that I don't worry about dark bores when I buy something.
 
Back
Top