oberkommando
New member
How is it that government contract weapons such as the M14 M16 AND FAL seem to have a zero defect with reguard to surface hardness, reliability, and fit, but all the aftermarket makers are like the stock market, with ups and downs when they make receivers? Can't any use CNC machinery with any competance? Or is it that ONLY Ruger can cast, and ONLY HK can stamp with any quality.
Have seen numerous posts describing the problems with new guns, parts,parts kits, but oem parts and recievers are perfect? specifically DSA, ENTERPRISE ARMS, SMITH ENTERPRISE, IMBEL, CENTURY, OLYMPIC, BUSHMASTER, COLT, SPINGFIELD,AND EVEN THE CHI-COM.
These companies need to look to the after market 1911 companies such as Ed Brown, Les Baer, Kings, Swensen, and others, to see how to make quality parts or recievers. Its hard to believe that only 1911 pistol parts, GERMAN Hk rifles, and a few bolt guns are decent.
Have seen numerous posts describing the problems with new guns, parts,parts kits, but oem parts and recievers are perfect? specifically DSA, ENTERPRISE ARMS, SMITH ENTERPRISE, IMBEL, CENTURY, OLYMPIC, BUSHMASTER, COLT, SPINGFIELD,AND EVEN THE CHI-COM.
These companies need to look to the after market 1911 companies such as Ed Brown, Les Baer, Kings, Swensen, and others, to see how to make quality parts or recievers. Its hard to believe that only 1911 pistol parts, GERMAN Hk rifles, and a few bolt guns are decent.