PSS vs. LTR
- Thread starter Dave3006
- Start date
First difference is the lost velocity from the shorter tube. But it's not that much to worry about, especially in a police/SWAT application, where engagement distances aren't too far. The lighter barrel and stock of the LTR would add to the recoil of the .308, but there are even lighter Model 7's out there in .308, and I don't hear too many folks complaining about the recoil there, either. I'd buy one if I didn't already have my .308 PSS...
Remington developed the LTR when it realized that most shots taken by police snipers are under 100 yards. The heavier long range feature (800 yards plus) of the PSS wasn't always required and a lighter, handier rifle could fill a niche in the police arsenal. Hence, the LTR was developed. Originally it was to be based on the lighter Model 7, but Remington decided that the LTR should not sacrifice durability (or the customer's critical eye with this respect) and the 700 action was selected. Various barrel flutings were tried before the current version was adopted. One prototype even had an 18" barrel.
Remember, the mission for the PSS is different from the LTR. Tailor the equipment to fit the mission.
Remember, the mission for the PSS is different from the LTR. Tailor the equipment to fit the mission.
700PSS Shooter
New member
My PSS is .308 for all the reasons given above.
My LTR is .223 since I intend to use it for a prairie dog hunt and a walking varmint gun and wanted the 1-9" twist, lighter weight, and the fluting to help cool the barrel. I will also use it for groundhogs.
Bill
------------------
My LTR is .223 since I intend to use it for a prairie dog hunt and a walking varmint gun and wanted the 1-9" twist, lighter weight, and the fluting to help cool the barrel. I will also use it for groundhogs.
Bill
------------------