proposed regulations regarding the implementation of SB-23

  • Thread starter Thread starter dZ
  • Start date Start date

dZ

New member
http://www.nramemberscouncils.com/CAL-DOJregs2.shtml
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>It must be noted that the Department of Justice Staff was courteous and polite at all times. In fact, they requested that we include
that statement in this report. The only serious concern that I had regarding the operation of the hearings were the enormous number
of law-enforcement personnel, from various agencies, that were present. DOJ, CHP, and a private security force were all very
obviously present to escort the public to the metal detectors, perform electronic body searches with hand held metal detectors, and
yes - the most important task - to open the doors to the hearing rooms. It was the first time that I had ever had so many heavily
armed doormen.

Of the many topics discussed at the Department of Justice SB-23 hearing in Los Angeles, the ones included in this report are of the
most interest. DOJ Staff, including Randy Rossi, Director of DOJ's Firearms Division, openly admitted several things that have not
been publicly acknowledged in the past.

Some of those items are referenced herein: ( listed in no specific order )

Although the Attorney General, Bill Lockyer, has publicly stated that the "Proposed Regulations" will not be re-written or
amended, his staff made statements to the contrary.
The "One Minute Fix" is a legal alternative to registering a firearm under SB-23.
Converting firearms to fire rimfire cartridges, instead of centerfire, is a legal alternative to registering a firearm under
SB-23. The example discussed was that of a Bushmaster XM15 with the designation of ".223 caliber" on the lower
receiver. DOJ Staff admitted that function of the firearm is what determines the necessity of registration, not the labeling
or name. Thus, an "AR-15 type" firearm that has been converted to .22 long rifle (with a conversion kit) would "exempt it
completely" from SB-23 and the "Assault Weapon" designation.
Parts, such as pistol grips, flash suppressors, and thumbhole stocks, can be legally sold and possessed - WITHOUT
REGISTRATION - as long as they are not installed on the firearm. NOTE / EXAMPLE: If a person has a AR-15 type
firearm that has been converted to fire rimfire ammunition ( a non-assault weapon ) and also possesses an upper
receiver assembly in a centerfire caliber, the centerfire type upper receiver cannot legally be INSTALLED on the
firearm, but it can still be possessed.
Damaged or destroyed "High-Capacity Magazines" can be made to function again by replacing the damaged parts. One
serviceable part must remain intact from the original magazine. The example given by the DOJ Staff was "If you were to
run over your "High-Capacity Magazine" with your car and only the follower was left intact, you could legally order
replacement parts such as the magazine body, spring and floorplate to make your magazine function again."
BATF accepted definitions of "Flash Suppressor", "Muzzle Brake", and "Compensator" will be accepted and used by
California DOJ regarding SB-23. Muzzle brakes and compensators will have to be "BATF approved" to be allowed
without registration.
Alternative grip designs, such as after-market models, will not be approved for use without registration of firearm as an
"Assault Weapon." Somehow, I think this issue is NOT settled.

The above mentioned items and topics were discussed over a period of several hours with DOJ staff, representatives, and lawyers.
Many other conversations were "off-the-record" and are not listed here.

It must also be mentioned that Mr. Rossi acknowledged the fact that the DOJ monitors pro-gun websites and e-mail traffic. It
must be nice to get well paid to sit around and surf the web.[/quote]

Hi DOJ!
I took my family out for a nice dinner tonight and tomorrow i think we will go to church.

-doc Zox
 
Back
Top