Proof of Fraud in Dade County

G

Gary H

New member
DADE COUNTY FRAUD...LOOK AT THE NUMBERS..

The Broward recount continues with 507 of 609 counted, Gore has picked-up 117 votes for a projected Bush victory once all counties are counted of 732 votes.

I had previously thought that the justices would rule based on the law, but the nature of the questions has put my opinion in the unlikely column. If they just say counting can go on, but the ballot must be punched, then Bush wins. If dimpled ballots are allowed, then Bush should still win, but fraud is very likely with dimpled ballots.

The newly found Gore votes are coming at a pace in Dade county which defies explanation. At present pace, they should add almost 422 votes to the Gore total in DADE ALONE. This does not include dimpled ballots. How can they have so many votes for Gore? Broward is not counting dimple, but they are setting them aside. Dimples (in Broward) occur 1.9 times more frequently than their present count. Using these figures and projecting to all counties, Bush would still win by 355 votes. What I'm saying is that using Broward as the standard, adding in dimpled ballots, counting all votes from all counties that are hand counting, Gore picks up a total of 575 votes. Dade county alone is projecting a 422 vote gain based upon a report of 46 Gore votes gained after 67 of 614 precincts counted. Go figure. Something is going on in Dade county. There is no question.


[Edited by Gary H on 11-21-2000 at 01:49 PM]
 
Comment I posted on another board

Same topic though:

IMHO the FL supreme court justices, though their questioning did not demonstrate this, are on very thin legal ice here. The FL state election laws are clear and amazingly to the point. The nature of the appeal was to either uphold the lower court decision that the Secretary of the State of FL was "non arbitrary" in her decision to certify the vote or not. Recounts, new deadlines, and other processes injected into this by the supreme court will violate FL state law that exsisted prior to the election. If this is done and the SC "legislates from the bench" as they appear they are wont to do then they will face a two fold dilema. 1) They have violated a federal statute that requires election laws within a state to remain the same while an election is being certified. The laws can be changed for the next election but not the past one. 2) They will also have violated the "separation of powers" as defined in the US constitution of Judicial, Legislative, and Executive branches.

The first is a clear cut statute and they will have to take a lot of heat for it if they violate it. The second is an even bigger can of worms because the Supreme Court of The United States of America may have to address the entire issue of "legislating from the bench"! Now, every liberal activist judge would quiver with fear if their right to adulterate the law in smaller, less visible cases was suddenly removed by a new finding from the US SC! These FL judges would most likely be impeached if they caused that to happen.

Make no mistake, they are in deep kimshe if they don't toe the line with the law. Because the Republican controlled Congress has the final say to even accept the FL ballot at all. If they feel the results are tainted, and every R Rep. down there has said as much about those "dimpled ballots", then this is all moot. GW will be voted in by the Republican Congress and EVERY voter in FL will be disenfrancised.

These FL SC justices must know this and despite their obvious questions on fairness, if they don't uphold the law that's when the fur's really gonna fly!
 
Maimi-Dade County Calls it Quits

MSNBC Cable News has just sadid that the Maimi-Dade County Election Board says that they are stopping all manual recounting and will certify their November 8th machine recount figures.
 
I agree with most of what AFB has stated very accurately. My only concern comes with relying on the US Supreme Court to come down on the FL Supreme Court. In almost all recent filings before the US Supreme Court, they have either sided with the state supreme court or not even taken up the issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top