Keiller TN
New member
I would like to hear some comments on the statement below by Spitzer. It is from abcnews
"The 2nd Amendment pertains only to citizen service in a government organized and regulated militia. It bears no connections with hunting, sporting, personal self-protection, or any other personal use. We know this because people who wrote the 2nd Amendment stated that the purpose for inclusion of the 2nd Amendment was to protect state government's rights to form militias.
The 2nd Amendment was not designed to allow rebellion or revolution. Such actions are outside of the Constitution. In fact, the Constitution says that the militia is to be used to suppress rebellion. As a matter of law, the 2nd Amendment bears no direct relationship to the current controversy over guns."
"The 2nd Amendment pertains only to citizen service in a government organized and regulated militia. It bears no connections with hunting, sporting, personal self-protection, or any other personal use. We know this because people who wrote the 2nd Amendment stated that the purpose for inclusion of the 2nd Amendment was to protect state government's rights to form militias.
The 2nd Amendment was not designed to allow rebellion or revolution. Such actions are outside of the Constitution. In fact, the Constitution says that the militia is to be used to suppress rebellion. As a matter of law, the 2nd Amendment bears no direct relationship to the current controversy over guns."