Pro-Gun and Family Feature Story

HarryB

New member
http://www.azcentral.com/news/0206shooter.shtml





U.S. champions in long-range target events
Prescott teen girls rank with world's best shots

Jack Kurtz/The Arizona Republic

Middleton Tompkins (left rear), also a champion shooter, is the family coach. His wife, Nancy, was the 1998 high-power rifle champion. Michelle (left front) and Sherri can outshoot most long-range snipers.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


By William Hermann
The Arizona Republic
Feb. 6, 2000

The scene: the 1999 national shooting championships at Camp Perry, Ohio.

The event: rifle targets at 1,000 yards, no telescopic sights.

The competitors: a crew of the nation's most deadly snipers from the Secret Service, the FBI, the Marines and elsewhere.

Oh, and Michelle and Sherri, two teenage girls from Prescott.

Guess who won.

Nor was last summer's victory a rare event for Michelle Gallagher, 18, and sister Sherri, 16. In fact, they know few people better with a rifle than they.

One happens to be their mother, Nancy Tompkins-Gallagher, 40, who won the national high-power rifle championship in 1998.

The other is their stepfather, Middleton Tompkins, 62, who's been champion six times.

Their mother wasn't at all surprised at the girls' success.

"I like the Secret Service guys," Nancy Tompkins-Gallagher said, "but they aren't that hot with a rifle.

"I've told Michelle and Sherri that if I'm ever in a hostage situation and a sniper is called for, I want one of you girls to take the shot."

Calling the Tompkins-Gallagher family "respected" in the highly competitive community of champion shooters is a bit like calling Bill Gates "well-off."

"The fact is, the Tompkins family has almost supernatural shooting ability," said Jim Smith of Glendale, a "master" level rifle competitor. "They've won hundreds of trophies and are among the best marksmen in the world."
Jack Kurtz/The Arizona Republic

Sherri Tompkins, 16, checks with her scorer Saturday after a round at the Ben Avery Shooting Range in Phoenix. The champion long-range shooter keeps a teddy bear nearby during competitions.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The family is also famous for a less exotic trait: being really nice people.

"They are about as decent a group of people as you could find," said firearms designer Scott Medesha of Mesa.

Which may be no accident. In fact, the Tompkins family serves as compelling evidence that dedicated, expert shooters need be neither gun-crazy nor obsessed with the Second Amendment -- and certainly not macho.

Gallagher-Tompkins posits a definite link between phenomenal marksmanship and "living a proper, decent life."

"You find that most champion shooters are pretty collected, temperate people who know who they are," she said.

"A sense of inner calm and poise is important not only to holding the rifle steady, but to doing the mental work necessary to completing a perfect shot.

"There's no room for inner turmoil."

Not that these are bionic people. Nancy Tompkins-Gallagher smiles readily and likes to laugh. Michelle and Sherri giggle, joke, and talk about boys, friends, clothes and other common teenage topics.

But at the firing line, something changes.

"It's all about concentration," Tompkins-Gallagher said, recalling how she had to go through with a match on the day a beloved grandmother died.

"But on that day, like every other day, when I walked to the shooting line I put everything else out of my mind," she said.

"I believe I won that match."

A shooter aiming at a target 1,000 yards away sees a circle about the size of a car tire with the bull's-eye as the hubcap. And the rifle barrel must be aimed so that the bullet would fly 30 feet above the target if it didn't drop.

But a bullet does drop -- and winds can blow it as much as 40 feet to either side of the target.

"Judging the wind, adjusting your sights for the wind, may be the hardest thing," said Michelle, who like her sister is a straight-A student.

In fact, there might be six different winds between shooter and target, each pushing the bullet around.

"So you watch the wind flags blowing, and you watch the mirage moving around," Michelle said. "And you make a judgment and hope it's right."

Tompkins-Gallagher said that she didn't push her daughters into shooting and that they both have numerous other interests as well. Their ability, she said, stems primarily from remarkable powers of concentration.

And that, she added, "is because they are balanced and happy people to begin with."

Middleton Tompkins, meanwhile, is known as something of a maverick in the firearms community because he's willing to criticize the National Rifle Association.

Tompkins strongly defends Americans' right to own and use firearms. But he feels the NRA and the firearms industry "have done a disservice to shooters and maybe to the country."

"When the hunters and target shooters who'd controlled (the NRA) for years got run out by some people who were obsessed with the Second Amendment thing, we got into trouble."

Tompkins is especially concerned over the import of millions of cheap military rifles.

"Those rifles are good for only two things: killing people and breaking rocks," he said. "Bringing those cheap rifles in hurt us badly. The NRA should have fought it and they didn't."

As a result, he said, "reasonable people who participate in the shooting sports and in hunting get lumped in with some fanatics."

Gallagher-Tompkins agreed.

"I think most people who own firearms are like us, and no danger to anyone."

Except, perhaps, to some egos at the Secret Service.


***

Reach the reporter at William.Hermann@Arizona Republic.com or at (602) 444-8057.

BACK TO TOP
COMMUNITY | AP's THE WIRE
BUSINESS | CARS | COMPUTING
CLASSIFIEDS | REAL ESTATE | JOBS | MEET YOUR MATCH
ENTERTAINMENT | SPORTS | TRAVEL | E-MAIL | FORUMS | HOME
Copyright 2000, Arizona Central
Search The Republic's Archives | Subscribe to The Republic

Contact us
 
"Those rifles are good for only two things: killing people and breaking rocks," he said. "Bringing those cheap rifles in hurt us badly. The NRA should have fought it and they didn't." was said by Thompson

This is a pro-gun article? This hurts us worse than almost any other article I have ever read. Hey even the top of the shooting sports say that those rifles are only good for killing people.

"Which may be no accident. In fact, the Tompkins family serves as compelling evidence that dedicated, expert shooters need be neither gun-crazy nor obsessed with the Second Amendment -- and certainly not macho."

So now if we either like guns or want to defend the constiution we are now not quite right? Sorry, but the author of this article just does not get it. Neither does Mr. Thompson.



------------------
Richard

The debate is not about guns,
but rather who has the ultimate power to rule,
the People or Government.
RKBA!
 
Cute story but apparently mommy and daddy have not taught their daughters the meaning of the Second Amendment, nor the correct version of American History.

It just amazes me, "Here's 10 articles that comprise the Bill of Rights , your rights."

"Naa, take a few of them away, 10 is too many..."

Talk about the prophecy of "unintended consequences"...

Be safe.

CMOS

------------------
GOA, TSRA, LEAA, NRA, SAF and I vote!
 
I will assume that the family is probably shooting Match Grade M1A's or something...

This guy, Mr. Tompkins ought to just sell his sporting tools now, and find another sport. The audacity of this guy saying
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Those rifles are good for only two things: killing people and breaking rocks," he said. "Bringing those cheap rifles in hurt us badly. The NRA should have fought it and they didn't." [/quote]

If he hasn't figured out that the Gun Grabbers want his "sporting rifles" also, he is seriously delusional.

Consider this story... http://www.uniontribune.com/news/utarchives/cgi/idoc.cgi?522571+unix++www.uniontrib.com..80+Union-Tribune+Union-Tribune+Library+Library++%28oly

What a putz... If anyone ever has the opportunity to talk to Mr Tompkins, kindly pass along my disdain to this Sarah Brady disciple
 
Oops--forgot to put the ? in the title. It's a shame to see his take on weapons that are less than match grade. Of course--his "sniper" weapons aren't too far down on the grabbers list...
 
This is right next to a gun bigot columnist's diatribe today. When I saw this article, I mistakenly thought it was a positive balance. Then I found the obligatory slight against the NRA and the RKBA. What an ignorant jerk. He and his family may be great marksmen/women, but their logic isn't even on the paper.

[This message has been edited by Jeff Thomas (edited February 06, 2000).]
 
Hats off and deep bows to the girls from Prescott for their outstanding performance, perfect grades and exceptional attitudes. (Tosses hat in the air for their upbringing, too) Would also have LOVED to see the FBI and Secret Service guys slink away from that match, too.

[This message has been edited by fastforty (edited February 06, 2000).]
 
"When the hunters and target shooters who'd controlled (the NRA) for years got run out by some people who were obsessed with the Second Amendment thing, we got into trouble."

Without the "Second Amendment thing" they would have been forced to give up their sport a long time ago

"Those rifles are good for only two things: killing people and breaking rocks," he said. "Bringing those cheap rifles in hurt us badly. The NRA should have fought it and they didn't."

Well their rifles are only good for two things, assassinating public officials and punching holes in paper targets.


"Tompkins is especially concerned over the import of millions of cheap military rifles."

So only people that can afford thousand dollar match grade rifles should have guns?

These people are worse than the most radical anti-gunners out there. Either all guns are ok or they are all bad. There is no middle ground in the gun control debate. By rationalizing some guns as good while others are bad they pave the road for all guns being deemed bad
 
Gee, a gun person calling owners of AR-15s and AKs "fanatics". Kinda like being raped by your own brother.

I'll agree with him on one point. My AR-15 will be good for killing people. People who are criminals and are bent on causing harm to me and the people I love.

The father sounds like a fence sitter that needs some swaying to our side. Is there any contact info?

------------------
"Ray guns don't vaporize Zorbonians, Zorbonians vaporize Zorbonians" The Far Side
 
You know, I don't know why I didn't think of this at first, but hell ... there are a lot of people that compete with AR's and M1A's. So, does this guy have his underwear in a twist only over AK's, or do the 'lowly' AR's bug him too?

Oh, well, who cares - I doubt that logic will affect this justifiably proud papa.

BTW, we've unfortunately got two threads going on this topic ...
 
I say good for the girls, being able to shoot well at a 1,000 yards but Poppa sounds like he is missing a few cartridges out of the box. There are anit's looking at "Sniper Rifles" to ban, and what they consider a SR covers about anything with a 'scope. What will he and his family do when their "sniper rifles" are banned and the BATF et. al. are looking for them so they can take the nasty gawdawful "sniper rifles".



------------------
Ne Conjuge Nobiscum
"If there be treachery, let there be jehad!"
 
You guys are too tough on him. Obviously a 62 year old man with a 40 year old wife and two teenage step-daughters can not be expected to think clearly about the second amendment. He needs a nap. Also it's possible the press took him out of context in an effort to divide and conquer. At least he taught another generation to shoot. ;)

------------------
Teach a non-shooter to shoot. Educate a voter.
 
Chute, you may have hit it on the head, we'll see.

I received the following in my email late last evening:

********************************************

"This was posted by Michelle on the highpower board on shooters.com. so before folks go off the handle, please read...

'Hi everyone. I'm starting to get tired of always having to defend people I care about, but here we go again...

That article was originally supposed to be showing the good side of shooting. It just got a little confused. Half of the things they "quoted" us on, we never said!!! Mid did not say most of the things they wrote that he said. The newspaper took what he said and twisted it until it said what they wanted it to. I know a lot of people agree with it, but he did not say it! I'm kind of surprised that you all were so quick to believe it all. Also, I know that no one has mentioned this, but I have to clear it up, too. They quoted my mom as saying that the Secret Service shooters cannot shoot. A lot of our closest friends are in the Secret Service. They are some of the greatest guys we know, and they shoot just as good! I have no idea where he came up with that one. I know that a lot of you will not believe any of this and maybe you don't want to. I just want to let you all know that Mid does not deserve everything that he's getting from this. He did not say that, so leave him alone. He's done a lot to promote shooting. I agree that we need to stick together to protect shooting. Is this what you call sticking together? If it is, I want nothing to do with it. The only reason we
shoot is because we enjoy doing it and we have a lot of friends in the sport. There's no reason to keep shooting unless you can do it with people you enjoy being around. I am glad that our friends are not so quick to jump on everything before they find out what really happened.

Michelle Gallagher'"

********************************************

Michelle is of Middleton ('Mid') Tompkin's daughters, and is one of the fine shooters lauded in the article.

In my letter to Mid, I mentioned TFL. If Michelle or any other member of her family visit TFL, I hope they will expand a bit further on this.

On the one hand, I'll take her at her word, and give them the benefit of the doubt at this time. On the other hand, I didn't have much respect left for newspaper and other media reporters, and if her assertions are true, then I gather that some of them are roughly on par with pond scum. What a disgusting development.

Since we have two threads running on this, I'm going to post the same update on the other thread as well.

Regards from AZ
 
From jaydee's link:

"If Olympic shooting is her goal, Perata says, she should find a state more friendly to the sport, much like Olympic skiers go to Utah and Colorado to train."

Thought I'd heard it all until I read this. Common decency prevents me from using the appropriate adjectives to comment on this.

Re Jeff's post on Michelle's response to the article on them, I too will give the benifit of the doubt. If the paper were to print a retraction, any bets where it would be? somewhere in the real estate section?

------------------
"...and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one."
Luke 22:36
"An armed society is a polite society."
Robert Heinlein
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
I didn't have much respect left for newspaper and other media reporters, and if her assertions are true, then I gather that some of them are roughly on par with pond scum. What a disgusting development.
[/quote]

You don't know the half of it… the writer of the article, Bill Hermann, is a Master level Highpower competitor who shoots an AR15-based match rifle!
 
Back
Top