Priceless!! Gun Buyback Program Backfires!!

wormtown

New member
I had a good laugh over this one, but it did cause some consternation as well. Once again, this shows the antis-- liberals, Gore lovers, Clintonites, whatever you want to call them-- make up the rules as they go along, and never honor a bargain even if it's one of their own making. Also rather puts holes in the "no questions asked" theory! How'd they know it was service revolvers-- or who turned them in-- unless they asked questions!!!!!!!!!

From: News and Views | City Beat |
Friday, July 28, 2000

Gun Buy-Back Backfires
When Officers Cash In


By MIKE CLAFFEY
Daily News Staff Writer

gun buy-back program to get illegal weapons off the streets had to be altered yesterday after a stampede of court officers tried to cash in.

Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes ordered changes in the initiative when he found out that court officers — some of them in uniform — were handing in their old .38-caliber service revolvers.

Because the program had pulled in only about 200 guns since the one-month window began July 1, Hynes upped the reward on Monday from $100 to $250 per gun.

"We had a surge last night of about 100 guns and they all seem to be .38 service revolvers," said a source in the prosecutor's office.

One court officer collected $1,500 by turning in six guns.

"This is a program with good intentions to get illegal guns off the street and shouldn't be bastardized by people looking for a quick buck," said Hynes' spokesman, Kevin Davitt.

"We're going to be contacting those people who abused the program and ask for our money back," Davitt said.

But a spokesman for the court system, David Bookstaver, said it is not clear that the officers can be forced to do that.

"District Attorney Hynes has indicated that this is really not in the spirit of what the program was designed for," Bookstaver said.

But he added that court officials "have no authority" to tell the officers to give the money back.

He said, however, that word was going out yesterday that court officers can no longer participate.

Some court officers in Brooklyn were upset that Hynes had forbidden them from participating in the buy-back offer. The officers were allowed to keep their revolvers after they were issued 9-mm. semiautomatics last year.

"I have the flyer right here and it says, 'Any working handgun, sawed-off shotgun or assault rifle. No questions asked.'" said Bob Patelli a Senior Court Officers Association delegate at Brooklyn Supreme Court.

"If the DA sees fit to discontinue the program, fine. But he's bound legally to pay for the guns he's already taken."

Patelli added that the program was achieving its goal of getting extra guns out of circulation.

"It gets the gun off the street instead of leaving it in a closet where children or a burglar could find them," he said.

Last year, 659 firearms were turned in for $100 each. The money comes from drug forfeiture funds, Davitt said.

"We thought that perhaps $100 was not meeting the value that some people place on these weapons," he said.

To be turned in, guns must be wrapped in brown paper and can be taken to any Brooklyn precinct house. If the gun is deemed operable, the desk officer is supposed to give the person a pink voucher that can be redeemed at the district attorney's office at 350 Jay St.
http://www.nydailynews.com/2000-07-28/News_and_Views/City_Beat/a-74714.asp
 
Hey, wait a minute! We didn't mean you people! We meant those people!

No fair! I call takebacks to infinity, so you have to give back the money......

:rolleyes:
 
Think of how successful the program is in preventing those officers from selling those guns to "children" or drug dealers in some dark alley. I'd say that the DA involved should be patting himself on the back for making it a kindler, gentler and more compassionate world. What a hoot!
 
Nahney, nahney, nyah, nyah!!??!!

Let's see, how to put this?

BITE ME, DAVITT! People like you make me soooooo proud to be a taxpayer (NOT!)
M2
 
There's so much spin on this one, I'm still dizzy.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>gun buy-back program to get illegal weapons off the streets had to be altered yesterday after a stampede of court officers tried to cash in.
[/quote]

Then he says this crap:

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>"It gets the gun off the street instead of leaving it in a closet where children or a burglar could find them."
[/quote]

Which is it, illegal guns, or guns stuffed in a closet.
I'm not an expert, but I thought BG's got the gun, used it illegally(again), then disposed of it, so not to incriminate themselves.

Also I didn't see mention that the guns were to be returned to the respective parties...

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Patelli added that the program was achieving its goal of getting extra guns out of circulation
[/quote]

Yeah, you know, the extra one that was in the box with the gun you bought last year.. Someone at the factory goofed, and put two revolvers in there, instead of one.. Sheeezzzz.

Oh, and this is truly a gun buy-back program.
They're buying them back from themselves.
Oxymoron.


[This message has been edited by Donny (edited August 01, 2000).]
 
I think they should have more gun buy-backs. Every time they try to do one it goes straight down the toilet for 'em. It only helps our cause.

------------------
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
 
Man, I remember seeing at a gun show a dealer selling those Jennings/Ravens/Whatevers out if a box all stack one beside another like baseball cards. I think they were going for $35 or $40 apiece. If only I could have seen the future.

------------------
- Ron V.
 
Guess I get to be the first to say:

I told you so.

------------------
God, Guns and Guts made this country a great country!
 
What surprises me is that there`s probably 30,000 retired cops with old M&Ps who didn`t take the opportunity to screw with Chuckie!
 
Donny makes an excellent point--remember how annoyed we used to get over the term "buy-back?" I mean, those goobers were never buying guns back--they were bribing citizens to turn 'em in to be destroyed. Buying them back would imply that the seller was doing the buying. At least this is close!
 
Heck. ArmySon makes an excellent point. I'm going down to the local sporting goods store, buying them out of any gun sold for less than $250, then headed to Brooklyn to make my fortune. ;)

I do so love it when the government creates an artificial economy. Its just a matter of figuring out how to cash in on the fiction. ;)

Mike

------------------
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects." -Robert Heinlein
 
The great thing is, the money is coming from drug money; not tax dollars. So who has a couple hundred Jennings they want to sell ;)
 
What would they do if I built 50 muzzle-loading single-shot handguns out of $10 worth of materials each and handed those in? They'd be functional, so.....

I got this idea from a story dad told us the other night that he'd never told me before. When he worked at the Pillsbury plant in Springfield, IL, one of his coworkers started a rant about handguns and how terrible they were (dad was buying one from another employee right before a shift at the time. Dad told him that just as people grow marijuana, people would simply make their own handguns if necessary so the ban was impossible. The guy told him that nobody could make a handgun themselves (apparently elves use magic to make the factory versions.)

So dad took him over to the machine shop, right then, and wasted half an hour of his shift making a functional single-shot handgun. It was a piece of steel pipe with a fairly loose firing pin arrangement at the breech end, covered by a heavy steel plug mounted to the breech with an industrial rubber band. When you loaded it with a 12 ga. shell and drew back the "hammer," you could fire it like a slingshot just by letting go of the hammer. It fired primed shotgun shells but he never took the chance of firing live ammo.

Of course, his co-worker told him that such a gun didn't count even after he demonstrated that it would fire a 12-ga. shotgun shell. :rolleyes: Smart guy.

Maybe next time I'll tell you about the time my dad almost didn't get his FFL because the FBI background check turned up his short career as a bank robber, kids.........
 
They should be ecstatic. The world is safer because there are less guns in existence. After all it is the number of guns "out there" that is the problem.
 
I guess my problem with "buybacks" is twofold. First, as many have already stated, the term "buybacks" implies the govt owns all firearms. Second, seems to me that these programs are nothing more than "firearm upgrade events." If you were a criminal with a hot junk gun, turn it over, make a huge profit, and buy a firearm of better quality. The end products of such buyback programs are satisfied liberals and a better armed criminal element.
 
Back
Top