Predictions on next Pro-Gun industry to be sued?

D

Donny

New member
How about it people. What's your predictions for the next in line.

The Ammo makers are being profiled. As are the FFL Dealers (Oregon FFL in another thread).
The support service are being profiled as well, such as magazine bans, ammunition classification bans (AP, API, APT, etc).
The commercial carriers have already been shut down, you know what I mean there.
Gun Shows are being stalked as we speak.

My gut feeling is that the publishers are going to be visited by the Klintonistas soon.
Thereby testing the 1st again, as was done in the early 70's, at the same time slashing the 2nd's abiltiy to communicate with.

I wonder how many 1st Amenders out there will fight back this time.

Best Regards,
Don

------------------
The most foolish mistake we could make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms; history shows that all conquerers who have allowed their subjected people to carry arms have prepared their own fall.
Adolf Hitler
 
My feeling is that they'll eventually sue anyone and everyone that has anything to do with something they don't like.

Notice I didn't say anything about guns.

That's because guns are only a small part of this. These folks are into control. They have strong opinions about issues and they haven't been able to get their way through the normal political process so they've resorted to what they think is a loophole. Civil suits allow them to flex their muscle and attempt to beat their opposition into submission. All you have to do is claim that you were wronged, suffered personally as a result, and you too can file a civil lawsuit. The anti-whatever forces can push this as far as their pocketbooks allow, and that goes for both sides. It doesn't matter who's right, it only matters who's bankrupt first. Why do you think the Democrats tried to push through the recent legislation that restricted the gun industry's right to declare bankruptcy over liability suits?

Well, do we close the "loophole"? What if that loophole also serves to protect people's rights. Sort of like the "gunshow loophole"... Is it really a loophole? When does it protect rights rather than infringe on them? Its a tough problem: How do you deal with clueless, manipulative, idealists without shutting down civil rights in the process?



[This message has been edited by pbash (edited February 07, 2000).]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top