I can settle this issue once and for all. Unless you are testifying to a personal experience with regard to the stopping power of a particular load/caliber, etc., OR you can produce studies with a high degree of reproducibility (which is the standard of any scientific theory and which in the case of personal defense is almost impossible since each situation is different - i.e., no two (much less multiple) gunshot victims are shot in the same place, at the same angle, with the same gun, the same caliber, and the same load), save your rhetoric. Even in the latter case, this still qualifies as anectodal and doesn't prove anything. As much as I enjoy a good debate, 99% of what I read would never pass the test of scientific scrutiny and therefore is only slightly better than pure speculation. Its still fun, but your absolute certainties don't mean much in the realm of reality.