Well, nowdays we call them PCCs, or pistol caliber carbines. We talk the relative merits of the new Rugers, the H&K models and so forth.
But if the caliber is 9mm, why not just use an UZI?
Is the UZI still reliable? The one I fired could produce hits on a sihouette to 200 yards. No plastic parts that I recall, so melt-downs would not be a problem. And even with the non-registered 16-inch barrel, it folds down to a very compact size!
So, aside from caliber for the .40 models, how are the newer PCCs better than a good old UZI? What do they do better?
But if the caliber is 9mm, why not just use an UZI?
Is the UZI still reliable? The one I fired could produce hits on a sihouette to 200 yards. No plastic parts that I recall, so melt-downs would not be a problem. And even with the non-registered 16-inch barrel, it folds down to a very compact size!
So, aside from caliber for the .40 models, how are the newer PCCs better than a good old UZI? What do they do better?