parents sue Glock over jewish ctr.

Meat-Hook

New member
Aug 10, 2000 - 09:09 PM

Parents Sue Gun Makers Over Jewish Center
Shootings
The Associated Press

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Victims' relatives are suing the companies
that made and sold the weapons that a white supremacist
allegedly used to kill a postman and wound five people at a Jewish
community center last year.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday, claims that Glock Inc. and other
makers of guns seized from Buford O. Furrow share some
responsibility for the Aug. 10, 1999, crimes. It seeks unspecified
damages.

Furrow is accused of wounding three boys, a teen-age girl and a
woman at the North Valley Jewish Community Center in the San
Fernando Valley, and then killing Filipino-American letter carrier
Joseph Ileto hours later.

Furrow, a convicted felon with a history of mental instability,
should not have been allowed to build an arsenal of semiautomatic
and assault-style weapons, said Joshua Horwitz, the attorney
representing the postman's mother and the parents of three
wounded children.

"It's not good enough to let guns go out your factory door and say,
'Sorry, we don't know where they're headed,'" Horwitz said.
"Companies like Glock need to make sure the retail purchaser is
the end purchaser and not turn their back on the distribution of
deadly weapons."

Paul Jannuzzo, Glock's vice president and general counsel, said
Thursday morning that he had not yet heard of the suit and could
not comment.

Victims and relatives have a deadline of a year after an event to
bring such lawsuits.

Furrow is accused of using a 9 mm Glock pistol that he bought at
a pawnshop to kill Ileto. In addition to Glock, the defendants
include makers or sellers of the six other guns seized from Furrow.

Furrow has pleaded innocent, and his team of public defenders
has launched an effort to save him from the death penalty.

In a private ceremony to remember the victims on the anniversary
of the shooting Thursday, about 250 children at the North Valley
Jewish Community Center sang songs and released butterflies into
the air.

The purpose was for the children and counselors to celebrate
among themselves "for pulling together and being there to support
each other through the year during a very wonderful time of
growth," said Lysa Barry of Barry & Associates, which is providing
public relations services for the center.

AP-ES-08-10-00 2106EDT
© Copyright 2000 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Brought to you by the Tampa Bay Online Network
 
I agree with these folks 100%. I mean, those Glocks are POLICE weapons! What kind of person would sell a police weapon to a mere civilian? We don't let GM crank out cars and sell them to just whoever--GM has to know exactly who the end retail buyer will be and make sure he's not a criminal!

Ummm....don't they?

:rolleyes:
 
If the 'retail purchaser' is the 'end user', does this mean that when we buy a gun, we have to keep it forever? (then will it to the children)? :D
 
Glock does know exactly what distributor each weapon is sold to. A distributor knows exactly what FFL it is sold to. An FFL knows exactly who bought which modern firearm. Last I heard, they were required to maintain a log for 20 years.
 
It figures, more misguided Jews who have forgotten what "Never Again!!!" means. :mad:

------------------
Yeah, I got a permit to carry,it's called the friggin Constitution.---Ted Nugent

"Glock 26: 17 rounds of concealed carry DEATH comming your way from out of nowhere!!! THAT'S FIREPOWER, BABY!!!"
 
Maybe we will all have to buy direct from the manufacturer in the future.You can't argue with ignorance.The lawyers only need a jury of ignorant or stupid persons in order to win the case.The real crime is the court system letting this type of thing go forward. :rolleyes:
 
Furrow, a convicted felon with a history of mental instability.
The real crime is the court system letting this type of thing go forward.
Couldn't agree more.
 
"Furrow...should not have been allowed to build an arsenal"

And who was supposed to stop him? Glock and other manufacturers aren't charged with enforcing laws courts handed down regarding felons. This almost sounds like Glock is being punished because Buford wasn't adequately supervised. One could just as easily attempt lawsuits against whatever judicial and mental health facilities Furrow came in contact with (they didn't correct his behavior), or any alleged racists he hung out with (they encouraged antisocial feelings).
Jeff
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Jffal:
[BGlock and other manufacturers aren't charged with enforcing laws courts handed down regarding felons...[/B][/quote]

Well, they soon will be. Already FFL holders are required to enforce "laws" through the required background check.

"Unpaid parking ticket? Sorry, Buddy. I can't sell you that gun. Gotta enforce the laws, you know."

Dealers are already a pseudo extention of the ATF and FBI.

Manufactures are next... :(

------------------
John/az
"When freedom is at stake, your silence is not golden, it's yellow..." RKBA!
www.cphv.com
 
Pawn shops are supposed to run a background check. If he was a nutbag, then how did he get through? I hate these lawsuits.
 
Historically banks have been responsible for more deathes than by any other means.

Wars are financed, it is a fact.

And who are these nameless and faceless bankers who lend the money?, OH NO!, let us not blame the money people, it is only business, they are not responsible for what these warring nations do with the money.

Young men die by the thousands, while these
individuals count their compounded interest profit.

Waterdog
 
Ironic. A Jewish family sues to force societal controls on companies that approximates some of the economic features of fascism.

Amazing. More idiocy in the courts.

Live and let live. Regards from AZ
 
Back
Top