Several years ago a poll of americans showed that they considered the greatest threat to their freedom to be their own government. If anything, the premise now seems even more well founded.
1) Truth is truth no matter who says it. Chairman Mao may have been a communist tyrant but that doesn't make his observation that (all) power comes from the barrel of a gun any less true.
2) They used to give lip service to the idea that the government's authority to govern derived from the consent of the governed - you and me. And that if it wasn't illegal, you could make up your own mind whether to do something or not. Not a popular idea anymore among our politicians, who think they need to protect and control and tell us what we can do.
And after seeing Cseaucescu taken out and shot, ( has anyone noticed that gun control measures didn't start passing regularly til after CNN let the world and Congress see his fate? ) an even more important issue is for politicians to protect themselves from being hanged or shot by some whacko with a gun. Politicians can't seem to understand that the desire of their constituents to see them strung up may have been brought about by something egregious they did themselves.
3) With Smith and Wesson, Colt, Ruger and whomever is next kowtowing to unethical and immoral pressure on them by the administration, it is ironic that the ability of the people to preserve their freedoms should push come to shove is increasingly provided by former combloc surplus arms imported at low prices:
a)the hundred/hundred-fifty dollar SKS's, and b)the hundred and fifty dollar Makarovs, with c)cheap enough ammo to buy a hundred rounds apiece of SKS and Mak ammo for fifty bucks.
For just now an armed populace's ability to resist provides a small but definite deterent to the more blatantly outragious govermental actions that might otherwise be taken.
I grew up watching the civil rights marches in the south in the '60s to get the blacks the vote. Now everyone can vote but sometimes I feel like the big money rigs it so it doesn't make any difference whomever gets elected.
But communist weapons securing for now whatever American freedoms we have left that haven't already been sold out? Does that leave as bitter a taste in your mouth as it does mine? Sorry, got a toothache just killing me. Rant mode off, but where am I going wrong and what am I overlooking? Comments please - thanks.
1) Truth is truth no matter who says it. Chairman Mao may have been a communist tyrant but that doesn't make his observation that (all) power comes from the barrel of a gun any less true.
2) They used to give lip service to the idea that the government's authority to govern derived from the consent of the governed - you and me. And that if it wasn't illegal, you could make up your own mind whether to do something or not. Not a popular idea anymore among our politicians, who think they need to protect and control and tell us what we can do.
And after seeing Cseaucescu taken out and shot, ( has anyone noticed that gun control measures didn't start passing regularly til after CNN let the world and Congress see his fate? ) an even more important issue is for politicians to protect themselves from being hanged or shot by some whacko with a gun. Politicians can't seem to understand that the desire of their constituents to see them strung up may have been brought about by something egregious they did themselves.
3) With Smith and Wesson, Colt, Ruger and whomever is next kowtowing to unethical and immoral pressure on them by the administration, it is ironic that the ability of the people to preserve their freedoms should push come to shove is increasingly provided by former combloc surplus arms imported at low prices:
a)the hundred/hundred-fifty dollar SKS's, and b)the hundred and fifty dollar Makarovs, with c)cheap enough ammo to buy a hundred rounds apiece of SKS and Mak ammo for fifty bucks.
For just now an armed populace's ability to resist provides a small but definite deterent to the more blatantly outragious govermental actions that might otherwise be taken.
I grew up watching the civil rights marches in the south in the '60s to get the blacks the vote. Now everyone can vote but sometimes I feel like the big money rigs it so it doesn't make any difference whomever gets elected.
But communist weapons securing for now whatever American freedoms we have left that haven't already been sold out? Does that leave as bitter a taste in your mouth as it does mine? Sorry, got a toothache just killing me. Rant mode off, but where am I going wrong and what am I overlooking? Comments please - thanks.