(OT) Russian Nuclear Submarine Trapped on Ocean Floor

Oatka

New member
I'm not much on prayer, but as an old diesel submariner, I'm saying one for these guys. It does not look good.
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGI42XA8WBC.html


Russian Nuclear Submarine Trapped on Ocean Floor

By Barry Renfrew
Associated Press Writer

MOSCOW (AP) - A Russian nuclear submarine with more than 100 crew members was trapped Monday on the ocean floor above the Arctic Circle, and chances of a rescue were not good, Russia's navy chief said.

Russian navy commander Admiral Vladimir Kuroyedov said the submarine Kursk had apparently been involved in a major collision and sustained serious damage.

"Despite all the efforts being taken, the probability of a successful outcome from the situation with the Kursk is not very high," Kuroyedov was quoted as saying by the ITAR-Tass news agency.

Navy officials confirmed Kuroyedov made the remarks.

It was the first major crisis involving a Russian nuclear submarine in more than a decade. In 1989, a nuclear submarine sank after catching fire, killing 42 sailors.

The Kursk plunged to the floor of the Barents Sea on Sunday while taking part in a major naval exercise off Russia's northern coast. Navy officials had insisted throughout the day Monday that conditions on the submarine were good and said nothing about a collision until the admiral's announcement that hopes of rescuing the vessel were fading.

Navy officials declined to say Monday how far the vessel was beneath the surface, but a Norwegian report said the Kursk was some 480 feet down, a depth at which it would be very difficult to rescue anyone because of the enormous water pressure.

Kuroyedov said it appeared that the submarine suffered major damage after colliding with another object, but he gave no further details. "There are signs of a big and serious collision," he said.

Russian and Western submarines sometimes play cat-and-mouse games in the area and have scraped each other in the past, according to reports. The Kursk was taking part in major naval exercises, which are closely monitored by the U.S. and other Western warships.

Earlier, navy spokesman Igor Dygalo said the Oscar-class submarine was not carrying any nuclear weapons and there was no immediate danger of radiation leaks or an explosion. The vessel's two nuclear reactors had been shut down, he said.

If the submarine was involved in a collision that ruptured its hull, there could be a chance of radioactive leaks. But Norwegian Foreign Ministry spokesman Karsten Klepsvik said there was no sign of a leak.

Norway, which has a scientific vessel in the region, said the submarine was lying in about 480 feet of water off Russia's Kola Peninsula.

The Barents Sea is in arctic waters bordering the northwest coast of Russia and the northern tip of Norway. Rescue ships were at the scene, trying to assist the stricken submarine.

Navy officials said earlier that they were in radio contact with the submarine, but it was not clear if that was still the case.

The Kursk was built in 1994 and went into service in 1995, making it one of the newest vessels in the Russian navy. It is a nuclear strategic submarine that can carry up to 24 nuclear surface-to-surface missiles, used mainly in combat with ships.

NTV television news, citing unnamed sources, reported earlier that water gushed through the Kursk's torpedo tubes during a firing exercise and flooded the front of the vessel.

In an emergency, a submarine would surface if at all possible. But Dygalo said the vessel was forced to descend to the ocean floor, indicating that the crew had lost control.

Vladimir Gundarov, a submarine specialist at Red Star, the official daily newspaper of the Russian military, said rescuing people from a submarine is very difficult and there is no set procedure. The Russian navy does not have advanced submarine rescue vessels, according to standard naval reference works.

"The situation is extremely negative," Gundarov said.

The crew may be able to use rescue capsules, but in a worst-case scenario would have to try escape by swimming out through the torpedo tubes, Gundarov said.

"It is extremely risky, but they are all trained to do this," he said.

At the Pentagon, spokesman Rear Adm. Craig Quigley said the U.S. military has not been asked to assist. Other military officials said that although the U.S. Navy has submarine rescue vessels, their hatches are compatible only with U.S.-made submarines and could not be used in this case.

Russian nuclear submarines have been involved in a string of accidents in recent decades.

In the last major accident involving one of Moscow's nuclear submarines, the Komsomolets sank in April 1989 after catching fire 210 miles north of Norway. Forty-two of the 69 Soviet sailors aboard died in the accident.

The Russian military, including the navy, is in shambles, with no regular maintenance of weapons and other equipment. Many warships do not receive the regular servicing needed to keep them seaworthy, according to navy officers and veterans.

The Izvestia newspaper reported recently that, according to the most conservative estimate, 507 submarine crew members have died during the 40-year history of Russian nuclear submarines.

© Copyright 2000 Associated Press.
 
This story may get even more interesting. Per the Fox News web site ( http://www.foxnews.com/world/081400/russia_sub.sml ):
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Kuroyedov didn't specify what could have collided with the submarine, but Itar-Tass quoted a Russian navy source as saying the accident may have been caused by collision with a foreign submarine. "A source in the Northern Fleet command said he believed this was the key version. He did not rule out that the foreign submarine was also damaged and was now not far from Kursk," Itar-Tass said.[/quote]

I'll keep a good thought for these guys.

Live and let live. Regards from AZ
 
Okay, I seriously would have posted this article this morning.. had I figured anybody cared. (Like you do care.) At any rate.. what I want to know is -- is who was Russia playin' cat-n-mouse games with this time?

------------------
God, Guns and Guts made this country a great country!
 
Just because we are "friends" now doesn't mean the old boys running the show have forgotten we were enemies. And there are a few other countries with subs that could have been playing around.
And boy do I feel for those guys. They may be Russian, but they are still fellow sailors, and I would rather be blown up than drown.
If they are good, and work like our Navy, they may be able to fix what went wrong and at least bring up one plant to get them up, but judging by the articals tone, not even their admiral thinks much of their chances.
 
Seems rather odd they would be unable to bring that sub up. 480 meters may sound deep, but in ocean terms that's pretty shallow. If that were a US sub down there it'd already be topside.

------------------
I twist the facts until they tell the truth. -Some intellectual sadist

The Bill of Rights is a document of brilliance, a document of wisdom, and it is the ultimate law, spoken or not, for the very concept of a society that holds liberty above the desire for ever greater power. -Me
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Oatka:
The Kursk was built in 1994 and went into service in 1995, making it one of the newest vessels in the Russian navy. It is a nuclear strategic submarine that can carry up to 24 nuclear surface-to-surface missiles, used mainly in combat with ships.

[/quote]

Since when are strategic missiles used mainly against ships?

I do feel for the sailors. I am hoping for a rescue, but it doesn't sound too promising.
Eric
 
Ehh. As was noted in the other thread on this:

1. The media (as usual) has no clue what it is talking about when you get into military hardware. The Oscar II class carries anti-shipping cruise missiles. Can they have nuke warheads on them? Sure, but most don't. In that sense, they are not 'strategic' in the usual use of the word. They are big-assed monsters of missiles, designed to take out warships and merchant ships in a single hit. The Oscar class subs really struck fear into the heart of navy planners back in the cold-war days. Our Aegis systems could likely cope with 24 incoming missiles. Likely. And when you have a limited number of carriers, they only have to get lucky a few times. We had to be lucky EVERY time. Not fun. (Wanna see a fun demo of that capability? Play Harpoon some time. Oscars are terrors, pure and simple)

2. 350-500 feet (the depth varies) might not seem deep, but its deep enough. Sure, research subs go down in the Marianas Trench and poke around routines. Those are research subs. Military subs do NOT dive anywhere near that deep. This sub is down deep, probably over halfway to its test-depth, and the russians will be very lucky indeed if they manage to pull anyone out alive. :(

Mike

------------------
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects." -Robert Heinlein
 
Also remember this: at depth you do not drown if your hull cracks, you get incinerated as the air compresses under the pressure just like air in a diesel cylinder. the other alternative is slow suffocation with madness increasing as the CO2 count goes way up. I have hunted boats like this in the 60's and remember playing tag with them in the far north. The guys on board were never the enemy, the former leaders were.

------------------
Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club
68-70
 
Back
Top