This thread goes toward the ongoing war on terror which is in defense of our rights which of course includes the second amendment.
I'm looking for confirmation or disproof of a rumor and I stress "Rumor" that the government actually knows where osama bin ladin is.
I have heard they refuse to take him out, due to the fact that if they do, his second in command, his brother-in-law, will take over if he is illiminated. I don't know his name, but he is supposed to be much more calculating and clever than osama is when it comes to planning strategic strikes against us their enemy. It was previously thought in years past before 9/11 that osama was a crazy man who had assets but no real expertise in employing them against a country like us. But this other guy has been supposedly feared by governments for years for his acts of terror and the ingenuity behind them. I want to know if despite all the lives lost so far in the war on terror, right now focused on the wrong country in my opinion, is this country's government too afraid to make the right move in taking out the man America hates the most. Or is our bosting of we do not bow down or negotiate with terrorists all just talk with no action, or in Iraq's case, the wrong action.
Don't get me wrong, I believe the Iraq war for their freedom is necessary, but osama should have come first. I do think Bush, or at least those working for him, instantly saw 9/11 as an excuse to take on hussein. That right now is beside the point.
So has anyone heard anything similar to this?
P.S. And please don't respond with stuff like this isn't gun related or point out the fact that this is all based on rumor. I have already stated my reasons for posting this thread and all I want is clarification and replies that address the validity of these rumors. Thankyou all.
I'm looking for confirmation or disproof of a rumor and I stress "Rumor" that the government actually knows where osama bin ladin is.
I have heard they refuse to take him out, due to the fact that if they do, his second in command, his brother-in-law, will take over if he is illiminated. I don't know his name, but he is supposed to be much more calculating and clever than osama is when it comes to planning strategic strikes against us their enemy. It was previously thought in years past before 9/11 that osama was a crazy man who had assets but no real expertise in employing them against a country like us. But this other guy has been supposedly feared by governments for years for his acts of terror and the ingenuity behind them. I want to know if despite all the lives lost so far in the war on terror, right now focused on the wrong country in my opinion, is this country's government too afraid to make the right move in taking out the man America hates the most. Or is our bosting of we do not bow down or negotiate with terrorists all just talk with no action, or in Iraq's case, the wrong action.
Don't get me wrong, I believe the Iraq war for their freedom is necessary, but osama should have come first. I do think Bush, or at least those working for him, instantly saw 9/11 as an excuse to take on hussein. That right now is beside the point.
So has anyone heard anything similar to this?
P.S. And please don't respond with stuff like this isn't gun related or point out the fact that this is all based on rumor. I have already stated my reasons for posting this thread and all I want is clarification and replies that address the validity of these rumors. Thankyou all.