sigcurious
New member
Linky
The article hints that this guy may have had the equivalent of a felony prohibition on possessing a firearm here in the US. Although the whole chain of events seems rather odd and to be an overreaction on many levels.
I hope some of the Canadian members can chime in on some of basics of Canadian firearms law that would pertain to this situation, such as what are the qualifications for becoming a prohibited person in Canada and is the system really set up as such that they can assume possession of something based on a drawing. Or was this a case of far overstepping the bounds of the law by the police and family services?
The article hints that this guy may have had the equivalent of a felony prohibition on possessing a firearm here in the US. Although the whole chain of events seems rather odd and to be an overreaction on many levels.
I hope some of the Canadian members can chime in on some of basics of Canadian firearms law that would pertain to this situation, such as what are the qualifications for becoming a prohibited person in Canada and is the system really set up as such that they can assume possession of something based on a drawing. Or was this a case of far overstepping the bounds of the law by the police and family services?