Oh boy, I can see this one going right off the rails!!
ClemBert said:
I'm having difficulty accepting the terminology "Civil War" to describe this particular conflict.
Having been born in Montana and raised in Wyoming, I was educated with the term "Civil War" and indoctrinated into the "fact" that the war was fought over slavery. It was a quick and easy way for the government educational system to rationalize a bloody and cruel war. One that in the eyes of our government was necessitated by the honorable duty of maintaining the unity of our country. (I can visualize ClemBerts ears starting to turn red about now). Of course I was young and my teachers were my trusted mentors who would never steer me wrong.
Then I started spending time in the south and educating "myself" into the history of this great part of our country. A diverse cross section of our population whose ancestors had the courage to actually stand up to the federal government and say, "enough is enough".
For that reason alone, we should celebrate the anniversary of "The War of Northern Aggression" and the people who had the courage to stand up to the federal government telling them what they as states had to do and charging them (taxing) for the service as well.
This rant isn't meant to imply that slavery wasn't a part of the reason for the war, simply that it was just that, only a part. Not the entire reason.
An unbiased opinion on the "Civil War" by CNN, really?? Isn't kind of liking asking Al Gore his opinion of Sarah Palin's stradegy on climate change?
Although I can never by considered a southerner because of my birthplace, I most assuredly will NEVER accept being referred to as a Yankee.
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." - George Santayana
I shall now go lay down by my dish and await the enlightened conversation which is sure to follow.