Kreyzhorse
New member
I apologize for starting this post, but as a civilian gun owner, I have to wonder how the Brady group will spin this?
Clearly this was not another "civilian who shouldn't have had access to a handgun" debate. How will the Brady Group spin this, if they acknowledge it at all?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21181488/
My guess is that the Brady Bunch will ignore this issue or if they address it at all it will circle back that if "additional background checks" were in place, this violence would have been prevented.
Thoughts?
Clearly this was not another "civilian who shouldn't have had access to a handgun" debate. How will the Brady Group spin this, if they acknowledge it at all?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21181488/
My guess is that the Brady Bunch will ignore this issue or if they address it at all it will circle back that if "additional background checks" were in place, this violence would have been prevented.
Thoughts?