NYPD Unrestricted Carry Business License Disapproaval

Status
Not open for further replies.

mrreynolds

New member
Company: Cavalier Knight LLC.
Tactical Equipment, Ballistic Threat Management, Firearms.

Member Business: NRA Business Alliance, National Shooting Sports Foundation (Retailer), New York State Sheriff's Association (Business)

Memberships Civilian: FBI New York Metro InfraGard (Intelligence), Fraternal Order of Police DC Lodge No.1 (Associate), New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, NYC OEM - C.E.R.T., NYPD - Police Square Club (Masonic), NYPD Operation Nexus (Anti-Terrorism), NYPD SHIELD (Anti-Terrorism)

Graduate: FBI New York Citizens' Police Academy 2011, NYPD Citizens Police Academy 2012

Licenses & Permits: NYPD Premise License, NYPD Rifle Shotgun Permit, Connecticut, Florida, Maine, Utah CCW's, FFL 01 & C&R 03.

APPLIED: November 26, 2013
INTERVIEWED: February 11, 2014
DISAPPROVAL LETTER DATED: June 13, 2013
DISAPPROVAL LETTER POST MARKED: July 08, 2014
DISAPPROVAL LETTER RECEIVED: July 09, 2014

Tuesday, November 26, 2013 - Friday, June 13, 2014
Result: 200 days or 6 months, 19 days

Reasons:


  1. You have not demonstrated a special need for self-protection distinguishable from that of the general community or of persons engaged in the same profession which is required for a license to carry a concealed firearm in public.

  2. You did not provide any contracts with current or potential clients with whom you conduct business with as required.

  3. You have not shown you have made any sales nor received any payments for any products.

  4. You do not have cash or products on hand ready for sale.

  5. You have not provided any substantial proof that would substantiate your claim of carrying any products for demonstrations on a routine basis.


My Response - Lawyer On Speed Dial:

PDF File:

NYPD Disapproval Document
 
The OP has his lawyer on speed dial, and this is a real life, important, personal legal matter for the OP. It's strictly a matter for him and his lawyer.

Discussing personal legal matters with a bunch of strangers in public is a lousy idea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Shamelessly copied from Frank Ettin's identical post on THR in response to the same OP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top