NRA Withholds Official Endorsement of Bush

TheBluesMan

Moderator Emeritus
Source You have to register to see the actual article, so here it is:

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>To Help Bush, N.R.A. Withholds Backing
By JAMES DAO

WASHINGTON, Sept. 11 — Defying expectations, the board of the National Rifle Association declined to endorse Gov. George W. Bush for president at its final meeting of the year on Saturday. The development makes it very unlikely that Mr. Bush will receive the group's formal approval before Election Day, N.R.A. officials said today.

That does not mean, however, that the rifle association will sit out the election. Far from it: the organization intends to spend millions of dollars supporting Mr. Bush and trying to discredit his Democratic opponent, Vice President Al Gore, as a threat to gun ownership.

But officials of the association said today that they did not want to provide the Democrats new fodder for attacking Mr. Bush, and so had decided to withhold a formal endorsement. Polls suggest that the N.R.A., while popular in many Republican areas, is viewed negatively by large numbers of the independent suburban voters whom Mr. Bush is trying to court, particularly women.

"Our goal is to do no harm" to Mr. Bush, one N.R.A. official said, noting that the group was already pouring money into the race to help the governor.

Mr. Bush has had a good working relationship with the rifle association in Texas. But he has tried to maintain a polite distance from the group during the campaign, and aides said today that he had not sought the group's endorsement, or its neutrality.

The Gore campaign has described the rifle association as "the Bush gun policy team" and has accused Mr. Bush of working "hip holster to hip holster" with the gun lobby.

And Handgun Control Inc. has been running an advertisement in several swing states featuring a previously disclosed film clip of Kayne Robinson, an N.R.A. vice president, telling a friendly audience that if Mr. Bush is elected, "we'll have a president where we work out of their office."

Once averse to getting involved in politics, the 129-year-old rifle association did not begin endorsing presidential candidates until the 1980's. But since then, it has been solidly in the Republican camp, endorsing Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984, and George Bush in 1988. The group did not endorse President Bush in 1992 or Bob Dole in 1996, because of differences on some issues, but it spent millions of dollars attacking Bill Clinton.

Joe Sudbay, political director of Handgun Control, said he was not surprised that the rifle association had not endorsed Governor Bush, because "they've become a real albatross for candidates," particularly among women.

Mr. Sudbay added that the rifle association did not need to trumpet its support for Mr. Bush because it was already making clear to its four million members — through speeches by its leaders, Web site postings and mailings — that it wanted him elected.

Indeed, officials of the rifle association said today that there would soon be a new round of mailings and, perhaps, television advertisements attacking Mr. Gore in several important swing states where gun ownership is high, including Pennsylvania, Michigan, Missouri and Ohio.

Accusing Mr. Gore of trying to play down his support for strong gun-control laws, one N.R.A. official said: "The guy's tried to reinvent himself on our issue since the convention. He makes statements that even I could agree with about supporting the Second Amendment. But come on. Look at the record. And we will certainly be reminding our members of that record."[/quote]

I think that the board of the NRA is still smarting over the comments of Kayne Robinson. His were poorly chosen words which did quite a bit of damage to Bush’s center-aimed campaign. I don’t think that an "official" endorsement is necessary. It is obvious from reading any NRA magazine that they are against Gore. And that leaves us with only one other choice. Right? ;)

Hmmm... Maybe they'll endorse Harry Browne instead.

------------------
RKBA!
"The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security"
Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 4
Concealed Carry is illegal in Ohio.
Ohioans for Concealed Carry Website
 
This is a sad reminder of the degree by which the media have succeeded in making a majority view look like a loony minority's.

I say the NRA is doing the right thing. I am sure that Gore himself has shied away from the "endorsement" of the few leftist groups that are still viewed as controversial by the pinkos in the media.

One up for a (finally) politically-savy NRA leadership.

------------------
Private gun ownership is the capital sin in the left's godless religion. Crime is merely a venial mistake.

Check out these gals: www.sas-aim.org

Get some real news at www.worldnetdaily.com
 
Actually, probably an astute move. No doubt the Democrats are a little off balance, not being able to beat Bush over the head directly with an NRA endorsement.

Under the heading of unfinished business, the NRA can't afford to have anyone around as stupid as Robinson was. With 'friends' like him, who needs enemies? Unbelievable.

------------------
 
Why didn't they just endorse Gore? Talk about some fun times for the media. :D Although it seems I remember a few years ago NRA backed candidates swept the house pretty good.

Personally, I feel endorsements mean very little in the real world. Most members of any organization know which candidate is their kind of candidate and will vote accordinly. Endorsements in races I'm not to comfortable with do tell me at times which candidate to vote against. If I see candidates endorsed by the NEA, Mafia, LULAC, ABA or Cubans for Castro, the opponent has one automatic vote.

RKBA!
 
Good tactics.

The sad part is that it'll actually work with a percentage of the "ignorant sheeple majority".

What's even worse is that if the NRA endorsed Bush, there'd be a few gunnies stupid enough to actually believe 'em.

Jim
 
Actually, I don't think an endorsement of Bush WOULD be appropriate, in any case. Our perspective may be a bit distorted by everything we've experienced during Clinton's reign, but Bush's statements since he went national have been far more anti-gun than anything a Democrat Presidential candidate would have uttered just ten years ago.

We may vote for the lesser of two evils, but our endorsement should be reserved for our friends.

------------------
Sic semper tyrannis!
 
Bush is as pro-gun a candidate as we've had in the last 20 years. But that is not a ringing endorsement. Reagan didn't take a line against the 2nd, Bush Sr. didn't take a line for it by any means, and Clinton worked hard against it. My gut reaction has always been that GW is pro-2nd, but won't go out on a limb and risk castration by the media. And, as I've said before, we are at this point where a candidate cannot make a stand for one of the amendments to the Bill of Rights because 76 million of the 80 million gun owners could give a hoot about the 2nd or any other article of the BOR. Why are we always looking for a savior, when the only people who can save gun ownership are gun owners themselves? What candidate would devote years of his life preparing for a run for office, trying to raise tens of millions of dollars, and then throw it all away to defend the rights of a bunch of folks who would sooner sit back and let the media define them than take the time to fight back? We are where we are because we, or most of us as gun owners, have allowed the media to define us. We're rednecks. We're stupid. We're "pre-enlightenment." We're callous. We don't care about Columbine. We don't care about kids. That's the picture of gun owners that the other 190 or so million in this country every get from Peter Jennings, and I can count on one or two fingers the number of gun owners I know who've done something to try to alter that picture. If all guns are banned, most of them would devote more time to golf. Or they'd hunt with a bow. Or they'd spend more time playing pocket pool.

Take a look around at the members of your gun club. There's your enemy.

Dick
Want to send a message to Bush? Sign the petition at http://www.petitiononline.com/monk/petition.html and forward the link to every gun owner you know.
 
Why stir up a sleeping dog. Gun control advocates are muzzled for the time being. Gore knows it will only fire up the pro-2's. Bush knows they are motivated to vote for him regardless of what Gore says.

Endorsement of Bush by the NRA accomplishes nothing. I'm pleasantly surprised to see the NRA and Bush keep their mouths shut. Now if Gore stupidly opens up the anti-2 rhetoric, then all bets are off.



------------------
Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.

Barry Goldwater--1964
 
Back
Top