No Jail Time in School Shooting

pax

New member
For discussion purposes only, from http://web.philly.com/content/inquirer/2000/11/04/city/PBARTRAM04.htm
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
D.A. vows to appeal parole for teen


By Julie Stoiber
INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

Expressing outrage that the teen convicted of shooting the Bartram High School vice principal outside a classroom last fall would serve no jail time, District Attorney Lynne M. Abraham yesterday said she would file a petition asking Common Pleas Court Judge Gary S. Glazer to reconsider the sentence.

"Judge Glazer has shattered the expectations of every law-abiding citizen in the community," Abraham said. "What it says is, you can get a free shooting in Philadelphia."

On Thursday, citing Eric Coxen's age and otherwise clean record, Glazer sentenced the 16-year-old to house arrest at his grandmother's home in Southwest Philadelphia and ordered him to go to school and get drug treatment. Coxen will be on parole for 111/2 to 23 months, followed by 16 years on probation.

"Mr. Coxen is probably laughing all the way down the street," Abraham said. "You can bring a gun to school, shoot up the school, and walk."

Coxen, who was tried as an adult in a nonjury trial in September, was found guilty of aggravated assault, two counts of reckless endangerment, and weapons offenses.

He shot school official William F. Burke in the thigh on Oct. 4, 1999, during a scuffle after Burke tried to break up a fight that had erupted in a social-studies class.

The bullet, from a .25-caliber handgun Coxen was carrying in his pants pocket, then lodged in the tennis shoe of teacher Vincent Hawkins.

Coxen, a freshman at the time, faced a maximum of 34 years in prison, and his lawyer and family members said they thought he was headed for jail.

But Glazer said he believed it was "totally inappropriate" to put Coxen in a state prison with hardened criminals.

"This is a terrible offense that has been committed, but it does not have to be fatal," Glazer said at the sentencing. "It does not have to destroy his life."

A staff member at Glazer's office said yesterday that the judge had been on the bench all day and did not know about Abraham's petition.

Abraham said her next step would be to appeal the sentence in Superior Court.

Coxen's grandfather, Orville Coxen of Skippack, was dismayed at the news.

"That's the district attorney's job," he said. "To me, the judge was very understanding in stepping back and saying, 'Maybe this is a youth we can do something with.' "

Julie Stoiber's e-mail address is jstoiber@phillynews.com [/quote]
 
Excuse me, but he committed assault with a deadly weapon, attempted murder, illegal possession of a firearm and he walked?

Jeez...
 
Just lovely. Just friggin' lovely.
As a teacher I have to walk into the school unarmed but a kid (16 year old freshman?) can get into a fight, shoot a school admin, and walk away?
A year ago I was kidding around with some coworkers about starting my own line of novelty ties for teachers... backed with kevlar. That's starting to look better and better.

------------------
Those who use arms well cultivate the Way and keep the rules.Thus they can govern in such a way as to prevail over the corrupt- Sun Tzu, The Art of War
 
It's the same bunch of liberal judges that would sentence a rapist to
18 months on parole. Child molestors are able to walk free after 6
months in jail.

Best thing would be to have these judges hang out to dry in the Mojave
desert.
 
Uhh, the story just says the gun went off in a "scuffle." It is not stated that the kid intentionally shot anyone, or even necessairily removed the gun from his pants pocket. These things may or may not be true. We don't know.

In the absence of these and many other facts, I'm not prepared to say that the calls to flush this kid's life are justified. Perhaps the shooting was accidental and the kid is "savable." Perhaps the judge's sentence was measured and just. We don't know.
 
and the Feds are where? I thought they were supposed to enforce the school free gun zones to make them safer...
 
Don Quixote (BTW, I love the user name), ordinarily I would agree. In fact I am always hesitant to be overly critical of reports where we have too little information to develope an informed opinion.
However, this is an extreme example of one of the cases at the very point where our RKBA rights are being attacked.
The same liberal whinners that use Columbine and every other school shooting as the bases of their argument for more "reasonable gun control" are the very ones that cry for light sentensing for someone like this. They to are the same crowd that screams for maximum penalties for law abiding gun owners caught up in unconstitutional legislation that even the law makers can not interpret.

It could be liked to calling for more strict control of henhouse mayhem. But when a fox is caught in the act of killing hens the same group for increased control advocate releasing the fox and restricting the roosters breeding abilities for the sake of the baby chicks.

------------------
Gunslinger

I was promised a Shortycicle and I want a Shortycicle!
 
Gunslinger (love your old themesong, BTW--Gene Pitney, wasn't it?), you are right that liberals always want to let violent hoods off with a wristslap, while throwing the book at FFL holders who somehow fail to fill out all forms just right. This general situation is quite disgusting, and I understand therefore the impluse to condem the kid in this report.

But the general situation isn't reason enough to condem a specific kid. I still want more facts.
 
Back
Top