I routinely have in my vehicle various firearms/accessories which classify as NFA items.
When in my vehicle, they are ALWAYS in a locking case, unloaded, and in the trunk not cabin area.
IN each of those cases I always carry a copy of the stamp and paperwork, just in case I ever come across any LEO questions under some other routine reasoning.
Well... My son just turned 16, just got a license, and when I got home from work today on my scoot, my son had been granted permission by my wife to take my vehicle to the gym.
So it occurred to me, "What would happen if *he* got pulled over under some routine condition?"
As I understand it, vehicles are legally an extension of the home, and under lock in my home or car *should* be "prevention of access" no different than if the gun safe in the house. (Does access to a lockbox imply access to the contents?)
But I know there are some grey areas as to "who is in control of the vehicle" or "I have a BAL > 0 and a carry license + there is a handgun in the car" etc...
Can anyone point me in the correct direction of some legal definitions and or or clarification of this situation?
Yes: I know the best solution is just do not let it happen. And that will be the course I strive for because I value my rights/items and simply want them to remain where they should. So opinions probably stay close to what I would agree with, which is DON'T, but I am curious what the law would actually be. And would it be based on the firearm in general or would NFA be a different concern?
A locked case, in a locked vehicle, in a locked garage hardly implies negligent storage or accessibility. And my son has a key to the door of my house, making the accessibility of car/home ambiguous at best (Concerning me being in home/in vehicle or not at time he is)
A good analog would be I invite a friend to house sit, who may have a record. I have a gun safe that contains inside locked guns. I have not made a firearm accessible to a felon in any more capacity than a felon walks into a Walmart.
It would seem that 46.13 https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.46.htm woudl cover this, but *reasonable* is a legal weasel word (no clear TL-xxx or anythign productive). That is as close as I could come to defining the scenario. It makes no distinction of home/auto/other, and seems to imply taking reasonable measures constitutes reasonable defense. And of course reasonable is the opinion of a jury, not a definition...
When in my vehicle, they are ALWAYS in a locking case, unloaded, and in the trunk not cabin area.
IN each of those cases I always carry a copy of the stamp and paperwork, just in case I ever come across any LEO questions under some other routine reasoning.
Well... My son just turned 16, just got a license, and when I got home from work today on my scoot, my son had been granted permission by my wife to take my vehicle to the gym.
So it occurred to me, "What would happen if *he* got pulled over under some routine condition?"
As I understand it, vehicles are legally an extension of the home, and under lock in my home or car *should* be "prevention of access" no different than if the gun safe in the house. (Does access to a lockbox imply access to the contents?)
But I know there are some grey areas as to "who is in control of the vehicle" or "I have a BAL > 0 and a carry license + there is a handgun in the car" etc...
Can anyone point me in the correct direction of some legal definitions and or or clarification of this situation?
Yes: I know the best solution is just do not let it happen. And that will be the course I strive for because I value my rights/items and simply want them to remain where they should. So opinions probably stay close to what I would agree with, which is DON'T, but I am curious what the law would actually be. And would it be based on the firearm in general or would NFA be a different concern?
A locked case, in a locked vehicle, in a locked garage hardly implies negligent storage or accessibility. And my son has a key to the door of my house, making the accessibility of car/home ambiguous at best (Concerning me being in home/in vehicle or not at time he is)
A good analog would be I invite a friend to house sit, who may have a record. I have a gun safe that contains inside locked guns. I have not made a firearm accessible to a felon in any more capacity than a felon walks into a Walmart.
It would seem that 46.13 https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.46.htm woudl cover this, but *reasonable* is a legal weasel word (no clear TL-xxx or anythign productive). That is as close as I could come to defining the scenario. It makes no distinction of home/auto/other, and seems to imply taking reasonable measures constitutes reasonable defense. And of course reasonable is the opinion of a jury, not a definition...
Last edited: